Dominguez: Chinese debt trap doomsayers have ‘no faith in own country’ |

Dominguez: Chinese debt trap doomsayers have ‘no faith in own country’

By: - Reporter / @bendeveraINQ
/ 05:38 PM April 02, 2019

Dominguez: Chinese debt trap doomsayers have ‘no faith in own country’

Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez III ALBERT ALCAIN/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO (FILE)

MANILA, Philippines — “You of no faith to your country” was Department of Finance (DOF) Secretary Carlos G. Dominguez III’s retort to critics fearing government won’t be able to pay the money it borrowed from China for big-ticket infrastructure projects under its ambitious “Build, Build, Build” program.

“The Philippines has never, never defaulted on its loans. The Philippines has not done it even in the worst time, and the worst time was right after Marcos,” said the head of the Duterte administration’s economic team in a statement on Tuesday, referring to the administration of former President Ferdinand E. Marcos.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dominguez was agriculture and agrarian reform secretary during the time of former President Corazon Aquino, hence was in the know about the state of the country’s finances post-Marcos era.

FEATURED STORIES

According to Dominguez, “even when the Philippines was cash-strapped, it had never defaulted on any of its loans.” He then recalled that the country paid its dues for the mothballed $2.2-billion Bataan Nuclear Power Plant, even as he noted that it became a “white elephant.”

“The Philippines has no history of defaulting on its loans. So why are people saying now that we will default? They have no faith in the Philippines? I don’t know why people are saying, ‘there might be a default.’ That means to say those people have no faith in their own country,” he said.

Also, Dominguez maintained that there was “no collateral involved in the loans that the government has entered into with any country,” urging the public to scrutinize all of the loan agreements entered into by the Duterte administration. Copies of the agreements were posted on the Department of Finance (DOF) website.

Dominguez earlier said “the Philippines will not fall into a ‘debt trap’,” citing that “in conformity with the Constitution and our laws, none of the pipeline projects funded with official development assistance (ODA) from countries like Japan and China allow for the appropriation or takeover of domestic assets in the event of failure to pay, which is unlikely.”

“The government’s borrowing program remains very conservative in the sense that we only borrow to invest in projects that will generate economic gains which are greater than the borrowing cost. No infrastructure project is funded through ODA without going through a rigorous system of reviews and approvals by the Cabinet and the President, and unless there is certainty that the project is economically viable and highly beneficial for the Filipino people,” Dominguez said.

“The government’s debt is carefully structured to ensure that it does not borrow without raising its own capital for infrastructure projects, while at the same time sourcing a significant portion of financing from the local debt market to minimize exposure to adverse external factors,” he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

Based on the latest National Economic and Development Authority (Neda) documents, of the 37 “Build, Build, Build” projects already approved by the Neda Board chaired by President Rodrigo Duterte as of January 31 this year, 12 big-ticket infrastructure will be rolled out through loans and grants from China.

Those in the pipeline included a total of 75 projects aimed at ushering in “the golden age of infrastructure.”

According to DOF, despite what seemed to be a big difference in rates at face value, recent loans from China, Japan, and South Korea were slapped almost the same level of interest rates when converted to their US dollar value.

On its website, DOF listed down the nine loan agreements entered into by the Duterte administration thus far, including $62.09 million for the P4.37-billion Chico River Pump Irrigation Project, and $211.21 million for the P12.2-billion New Centennial Water Source-Kaliwa Dam borrowed from the Export-Import Bank of China. Both Chinese loans were US dollar-denominated.

DOF noted the Chinese funding for Kaliwa Dam was a sovereign-guaranteed loan borrowed by the state-run Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS).

From the Japan International Cooperation Agency (Jica), the Duterte administration borrowed 11.84 billion Japanese yen for the P1-billion improvement of remaining sections along Pasig River from Delpan Bridge to Napindan Channel 3, a component of the Pasig-Marikina River Channel Improvement Project-Phase 3; 15.93 billion yen for the P9.89-billion Cavite Industrial Area Flood Risk Management Project; 104.53 billion yen for the P356.95-billion Metro Manila Subway Project-Phase 1; and 167.19 billion yen for the P628.42-billion North-South Commuter Railway Extension Project.

Two loans were already secured from the Export-Import Bank of Korea (Kexim): 114.26 billion South Korean won for the P7.38-billion Panguil Bay Bridge Project; and 184.84 billion won for the P9.19-billion New Cebu International Container Port.

The government also borrowed $40.7 billion from the World Bank and $23.9 billion from its Clean Technology Fund for the P5.46-billion Metro Manila Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)-Line 1.

For the two US dollar-denominated loans from China, the interest rates were both 2 percent; for the four Japanese yen-denominated loans, the rates ranged between a low of 0.08 percent for the North-South Commuter Railway Extension and a high of 0.26 percent for the Cavite flood control project.

The South Korean won-denominated loans were slapped 0.14 percent for the Panguil Bay bridge and a slightly higher 0.15 percent for the Cebu port.

As for the Metro Manila BRT, the interest was a larger 3.82 percent for the World Bank-funded component on top of 0.75 percent for the amount coming from its Clean Technology Fund.

Based on DOF’s computations, if the Japanese loans were offered in US dollars, the equivalent fixed US dollar rates would range between 1.47 percent for the Pasig-Marikina River channel improvement and 2.88 percent for the Cavite flood control.

The South Korean loans, meanwhile, would have equivalent fixed US dollar rates of 1.36 percent for the Cebu port and 1.42 percent for the Panguil Bay project.

DOF said the equivalent US dollar interest rates for the Japanese and South Korean loans were “estimated by calculating the US dollar swap fixed rate on a notional currency swap using the approximate average loan maturity, and market information available at signing date.”

Based on DOF’s calculations, all nine loans had equivalent fixed US dollar rates lower than the comparable interest rates had the government instead borrowed through the issuance of global bonds to finance the projects, such that these loan agreements were “considered favorable to contract.”

DOF said loans from the Export-Import Bank of China carried a fixed interest rate, while those from Jica and Kexim “carry a fixed rate based on applicable rates for consulting and non-consulting components (interest rate is calculated as the average of the applicable rates weighted by the corresponding loan amount for each of the components).”

Last month, DOF Assistant Secretary and spokesperson Antonio Joselito G. Lambino II said the government chooses which denomination to borrow in based on various factors, such as what the lender puts on the table, the foreign exchange depreciation risk over the life of the loan, and the prevailing market of the currency, among other considerations.

RELATED STORY

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Carpio fact-checks Dominguez: Philippines had defaulted on its loans

TAGS: Build Build Build, Business, business news, DoF, Loans, local news, nation, national news, News, ODA, Philippine news updates

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.