Well, it’s about time somebody filled her shoes, figuratively, we mean. Auto industry observers have been growing quite impatient waiting for the next move of the Chamber of Automotive Manufacturers of the Philippines Inc. (Campi) after the sudden end of Elizabeth Lee’s six-year leadership of the country’s leading car industry organization.
The news is out, the lawyer is it. The one who holds the rein at Campi is Rommel Gutierrez, vice president for Toyota Motor Philippines’ corporate affairs.
Inquirer Motoring caught Gutierrez at a rather inopportune time, as he was huffing and puffing to get some things done at the Board of Investments (BoI). But ambushes could reveal some juicy facts about the man, and the influential organization he has been tasked to lead. So, without further ado, here’s Gutierrez, in no time.
IM: Can you give us a brief background of your stint in Toyota?
RG: I have been with TMP for 10 years now. As VP, five years. I’m a CPA and lawyer, and I started with TMP as an accountant assigned at the export/import department.
IM: How about your career as a lawyer? Please also share with us your background in that profession.
RG: I got the bar exam result right after joining TMP. I have more corporate lawyering exposure than litigation.
IM: When you were asked to head the Chamber, what were your initial thoughts?
RG: My initial thoughts? The opportunity to provide leadership in an auto manufacturing industry.
IM: What were your personal experiences with Ms. Elizabeth Lee? Do you feel the weight of expectations as you assume the post?
RG: I have worked well and was comfortable with the former Campi president. I have my own leadership style, and I am ready to meet any and all expectations.
IM: We get the impression that your approach to the media is a bit strict and formal, probably because of your professional background. Now that you will represent other automotive manufacturers as Campi president, what is your approach to a freewheeling Philippine automotive media, and to motoring issues that may be raised every now and then?
RG: It’s going to be more fun (laughs). Let’s bring it on. (I’m) looking forward to have more interaction with media on a less formal basis.
IM: What changes in Campi management style can we expect to see under your term? What would you continue?
RG: To be more transparent and consensus-led and where everybody participates in decision-making. (I have) plans to continue to make Campi more visible and a credible industry association.
IM: How will you handle the different interests of Campi members? When Ms. Lee stepped out, she left behind unresolved issues, particularly those involving breakaway groups PACCI and AVID. Will we see any attempt from your end to mend fences, or do you think that separate groups should stay separate? Why, or why not?
RG: New industry associations were formed based on collective needs of its members. These associations should co-exist and cooperate for the good of the auto industry.
IM: Campi has also been embroiled in a legal tussle with used-car importers and vehicle smugglers. Do you think your background in law would finally place these issues at their proper conclusion? What is your view of Executive Order 156 and its amended version EO 877-A?
RG: The validity of EO 156 has been upheld by the Supreme Court. It’s just a matter of implementing it. As regards EO 877-A, BoI has already declared that it should be reviewed. We respect that and will cooperate in coming up with a better version.
IM: How will Campi, under your leadership, treat the lesser of the flock, meaning the other Campi members not part of the Big Three auto manufacturers?
RG: We have to balance the interest of all the members of Campi.
IM: Will Campi participate in any externally organized auto shows, like the MIAS, this year, or will the Chamber organize its own car show?
RG: Campi plans to have its own motor show this year as scheduled. We are currently evaluating it.
IM: What is your view on consumer protection rights in the Philippines? Do you believe a local version of the Lemon Law should also be enacted here? Why, or why not?
RG: Consumer protection rights should always be upheld. (The) Lemon Law should be able to address this without being detrimental to the interest of manufacturers/distributors.
IM: In light of the increasing incidences of trucks and buses (or other vehicles for that matter) losing control and getting involved in more fatal accidents, what is your take on the growing clamor to create an independent investigative body, much like the US’ NHTSA?
RG: Existing mechanisms to address this issue must be thoroughly reviewed first before the creation of such body, if that is necessary.