Dealing with informal settlements
Within five days after the termination of the preliminary conference, the court shall issue an order, stating, among others:
whether the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, and if so, the terms thereof;
the stipulations or admissions entered into by the parties;
whether, on the basis of the pleadings and the stipulations and admissions made by the parties, judgment may be rendered without the need of further proceedings;
a clear specification of the material facts that remain controverted; and
such other matters intended to expedite disposition of case.
If the court would find that further proceedings were unnecessary, it shall render judgment on said pleadings, stipulations, and admissions within 30 days from issuance of the order.
Otherwise, within 10 days from receipt of said order, the parties shall submit the affidavits of their witnesses and other evidence on the factual issues defined in said order.
Said affidavits shall only state facts personally known by the witnesses-affiants which are admissible in evidence, and shall show their competence to testify on the matters stated therein. Failure to comply with the requirement on affidavits may subject the party or the counsel who submitted the same to disciplinary action, and shall be cause to expunge the inadmissible affidavit or portion thereof from the record.
They shall submit their position papers, stating the law and the facts relied upon by them.
Within 30 days after receipt of the affidavits and position papers, or the expiration of the period for filing the same, the court shall render judgment.
When necessary to clarify certain facts, however, the court may issue an order specifying the matters to be clarified, and require the parties to submit affidavits or other evidence on the said matters within 10 days from receipt of such order. Judgment shall be rendered within 15 days after the receipt of the last affidavit or expiration of the period for filing the same.
In the meantime, the plaintiff may file a motion for issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction to restore him in his possession of the subject lot, which the court shall decide on within 30 days from filing thereof.
If, after trial, the court would find that the allegations in the complaint are true, it shall rule in favor of the plaintiff for the restitution of the premises, the sum justly due as arrears of rent or as reasonable compensation for use and occupation of the premises, attorney’s fees and costs. If a counterclaim were established, the court shall rule on the sum found in arrears from either party and award costs as justice requires.
The judgment rendered in an action for forcible entry shall be conclusive with respect to the plaintiff’s possession of the land, and shall not bar an action between the parties respecting the ownership of the building or land.
Thus, the Supreme Court consistently held that the sole question for resolution in an action for forcible entry is the physical or material possession of subject land. Even if the question of ownership were raised in the proceedings, the court may pass upon such issue but only to determine the question of possession, especially if the question of ownership is inseparably linked to the question of possession.
Upon motion, the court’s judgment in an action for forcible entry shall be immediately executory. If such judgment were rendered against the defendant, he may stay its execution by timely filing an appeal in accordance with the Rules of Court and filing a supersedeas bond to be executed in favor of the plaintiff. The supersedeas bond shall pay the rent, damages and costs due the plaintiff, accruing down to the time of the judgment appealed therefrom.
Considering that the parties never executed any lease contract, the defendant may be
required to deposit rent equivalent to the reasonable value of the use and occupation of the subject land for the preceding month or period at the rate determined by the judgment of the lower trial court on or before the 10th day of each succeeding month or period.
The supersedeas bond shall be transmitted by the lower trial court, with the papers, to the clerk of the Regional Trial Court to which the action is appealed.
After the RTC decides the case on appeal, any money paid to the trial court for purposes of stay of execution shall be disposed in accordance with the provisions of the RTC’s judgment.
Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.