CTA orders P761-M tax refund for San Miguel  | Inquirer Business

CTA orders P761-M tax refund for San Miguel 

/ 12:14 PM June 19, 2017

The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) has ordered the Bureau of Internal Revenue to issue a P761.06-million tax refund to San Miguel Brewery, Inc., for erroneously collected tax on its light-branded beer for the year 2012.

The CTA Second Division’s 33-page decision dated June 9 is the latest ruling in favor of the San Miguel Corp. subsidiary, which contests the BIR’s imposition of a higher tax on its San Mig Light product.

Article continues after this advertisement

The BIR had considered San Mig Light a “variant” of the older Pale Pilsen brand and obliged SMB to pay a tax of P20.57 per liter. SMB argued San Mig Light should have been taxed as a “new brand” at only P15.49 per liter.

FEATURED STORIES

The tax court did not even have to elaborate why SMB was entitled to the refund on the excessive tax payments. It had issued at least four en banc decisions in favor of SMB from September 2012, the decision noted.

“It has been consistently ruled that ‘San Mig Light’ is a new brand and not a variant… Consequently there was an erroneous, excessive and/or illegal assessment and collection in the amount of P5.08 per liter removal of petitioner’s ‘San Mig Light,'”

Article continues after this advertisement

SMB was bound to get such a hefty refund because it shipped out a total of 149.82 million liters from its five plants nationwide in 2012.

Article continues after this advertisement

Previous rulings explained that reclassifying San Mig Light as a “variant” would violate Republic Act No. 9334, which prohibits the BIR from revising the classification of brands registered from 1997 to 2003.

Since the BIR initially granted San Mig Light’s registration as a new brand in October 1999, only Congress can reclassify the beer for taxation purposes.

The court previously ruled that San Mig Light should not be considered a variant of “Pale Pilsen”—an older brand of beer with more calories but with the same 5 percent alcoholic content—because these words were not contained in the former’s name. CBB

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: BIR, Business, Court of Tax Appeals, San Miguel‎

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.