Chevron faces big Australian tax bill after court loss | Inquirer Business

Chevron faces big Australian tax bill after court loss

/ 12:48 AM April 22, 2017

Energy giant Chevron on Friday lost its appeal in a major battle against a Aud$269-million ($203 million) tax bill in a case that could have global implications for multinationals looking to cut their obligations.

The Federal Court ruled in favor of a 2015 decision by the same court that the US giant had minimized its payments through a loan scheme and ordered it to foot costs, estimated by local media at more than Aud$10 million.

The ruling is a significant victory for the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), which is investigating other global firms for alleged avoidance.

Article continues after this advertisement

It also followed an announcement by Canberra this month that seven multinationals were facing a total of Aud$2.9 billion in bills after assessing their tax arrangements.

FEATURED STORIES

Chevron said in a statement that it was disappointed with the outcome.

“We will review the decision to determine the next steps, which may include an appeal to the high court of Australia,” a spokesperson said.

Article continues after this advertisement

A response from the ATO was not immediately available.

Article continues after this advertisement

The ruling was closely watched as governments cracked down on multinationals that build complex structures to reduce taxation.

Article continues after this advertisement

Chevron added in its statement that the trial court had recognized that the financing was a “legitimate business arrangement” and that the parties differed only over what interest rates should have been applied to the loans.

KPMG tax partner Grant Wardell-Johnson said the decision was a “substantial win” for the ATO.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court heard that Chevron subsidiary ChevronTexaco Funding Corporation, which was incorporated in the US state of Delaware, had loaned its Australian arm $2.5 billion in 2003 at a favorable interest rate.

But tax officials said the rate of repayment—which could be set against tax—was much higher than if it had borrowed from another company. —AFP

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: chevron

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.