US gov’t calls for end to bickering after credit rating loss | Inquirer Business

US gov’t calls for end to bickering after credit rating loss

/ 07:15 PM August 07, 2011

WASHINGTON – The White House has called for an end to the political gridlock blamed for the first-ever US credit rating downgrade as allies voiced confidence in the world’s largest economy.

Standard & Poor’s lowered the US rating for the first time in history Friday, by one notch from its top-flight triple-A to AA+, saying US politicians were increasingly unable to manage the country’s huge fiscal deficit and debt.

The agency added a negative outlook, warning there was a chance the rating could be downgraded further within two years if progress is not made in balancing the country’s lopsided finances.

Article continues after this advertisement

Washington’s allies in Europe and Asia rallied behind the United States, warning against over-reaction to the downgrade, but China, the largest foreign holder of US Treasuries, slammed the US “addiction” to debt.

FEATURED STORIES

President Barack Obama stayed out of sight Saturday at the Camp David presidential retreat, but the White House chose to take the moral and political high ground, calling for a reality check among Washington’s warring factions in the wake of a controversial deal to raise the nation’s debt ceiling.

“We must do better to make clear our nation’s will, capacity and commitment to work together to tackle our major fiscal and economic challenges,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The bipartisan compromise on deficit reduction was an important step in the right direction. Yet, the path to getting there took too long and was at times too divisive,” Carney said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said Obama would encourage Democratic and Republican lawmakers to put their “common commitment to a stronger recovery and a sounder long-term fiscal path” above “political and ideological differences.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The rating cut — which came after US markets closed, allowing the world to digest the news over the weekend — was the first time the United States had been downgraded since it received an AAA rating from Moody’s in 1917.

It has held the AAA S&P rating since 1941. Other G7 nations such as Britain, Canada, France and Germany maintain the top rating.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a stinging English-language commentary carried by the official Xinhua news agency, China said it had “every right” to demand Washington address its structural debt problems and safeguard Chinese dollar assets.

Group of 20 deputy finance ministers held an emergency conference call Sunday, a South Korean official said. But he declined to elaborate on what was discussed.

Meanwhile, experts anxiously awaited reaction from rank-and-file investors when trading resumes on most world markets Monday. In a possible preview of things to come, share prices on Tel Aviv’s stock exchange, which is open Sunday, fell six percent on news of the S&P decision, forcing a temporary suspension of trading.

The US downgrade came after a strong pushback from the White House, which called S&P’s analysis of the economy deeply flawed and politically-based.

A Treasury spokesperson alleged there was a “$2 trillion error”, arguing that S&P admittedly used the wrong baseline and erred on spending plans and debt projections.

But S&P has repeatedly defended its decision.

David Beers, S&P’s global head of sovereign ratings, said Saturday that “the nature of the debate and the difficulty in framing a political consensus about how to make fiscal policy choices” had been key factors in the move.

“It really shouldn’t surprise anyone that we have to look at the process under which government policy is made… The political risks carry a higher weight than the fiscal part of the equation,” he said.

John Chambers, another top S&P official, said that compared to other highly-rated governments, the US did not have the “same proactive ability to achieve long-term solutions to put public finances on a firm footing.”

In its initial ratings statement on Friday, S&P said the deal finally signed into law earlier this week fell short of resolving the crisis.

The downgrade is a symbolic embarrassment for Obama and the United States, and could raise the cost of US government borrowing — a move that would likely trickle down to Americans in the form of higher interest rates.

There are worries that it will wreak havoc in global financial markets where the US dollar has long been the most important currency, but some analysts believe the cut will not have much impact.

Investment guru Warren Buffett criticized S&P’s decision, saying it “doesn’t make sense” and brushed off fears it would shake world markets.

S&P is considered the most influential of the three major rating agencies ahead of Moody’s and Fitch — both of which have said they will continue to review the US deficit reduction plan for possible downgrades.

The plan finally agreed on last Tuesday calls for $917 billion in cuts over 10 years, but also mandates an as-yet unnamed congressional panel to come up with another $1.5 trillion in cuts by the end of the year.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

That fell short of what S&P has been saying would merit retaining the AAA rating: $4 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years that includes both cuts and revenue increases.

TAGS: Debt, economy, Fiscal deficit, Gridlock, politics, public, Rating, Standard & Poor, US

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.