Quantcast
Latest Stories

Corporate Securities Info

Condominium ownership rights

By

No doubt about it, the country is experiencing a construction boom in commercial and residential projects.

The skyline in the business districts of Metro Manila and other urban centers has undergone major changes in the past two years.

Several old structures in the metropolis have been gutted down to make way for buildings that, in the words of their developers, are environment-friendly. “Green” has become part of the domestic real estate lingo.

In the process, the broadsheets are enjoying full-page advertisements on high-rise buildings that are about to be constructed, have been topped off, inaugurated or ready for occupancy by interested buyers.

Underused or idle lots in prime locations that are fit for commercial, residential or mixed-use purposes are in the crosshairs of enterprising construction companies.

The building frenzy has spread to the housing sector. The country’s iconic real estate developers have shifted their sights from the traditional high-end residences to middle-class and mass-housing projects.

The surge in construction indicates a strong demand for commercial and housing units that need to be filled up, a challenge that real estate developers with deep pockets are willing to risk their money on.

Citizenship

The question of who can buy or acquire real property was the subject of a recent query to the Securities and Exchange Commission by a company behind some of the biggest construction projects in Metro Manila.

The company wanted to know whether a private corporation, whose shares of stocks are 99.95-percent owned by foreigners, can legally purchase real property in the country.

The issue calls for an interpretation of the constitutional provision that states “save in cases of hereditary succession, no private lands shall be transferred or conveyed except to individuals, corporations or associations qualified to acquire or hold lands of the public domain.”

Read in relation to Commonwealth Act 141, which uses the percentage of Filipino ownership in a corporation as criterion in determining its nationality, the SEC stated that for a corporation to be able to purchase, acquire or own land in our country, it is essential that “at least 60 percent of the total capital stock of the corporation must be wholly owned by Filipino citizens.”

Thus, if more than 40 percent of that corporation’s capital stock is owned by foreigners, it is barred from acquiring land in the country.

The SEC, however, pointed out that, for other forms of real property, outside of land, such as houses or buildings, foreigners can, as a general rule, purchase them unless a law specifically prohibits them from doing so.

Ownership

To illustrate this point, the SEC cited the rules applicable on the ownership of an interest in a building or condominium project by persons other than Filipino citizens.

Such interest may be “in the form of ownership, lease or any other real rights.”

A foreign person or non-Philippine corporation—i.e., foreigners own more than 40 percent of its capital stock—can own an interest in a condominium project depending on the nationality of the person or entity that owns the land on which it is constructed.

If the condominium building, whether commercial or residential, is built on leased land, “the corresponding condominium corporation may be established by a corporation which is wholly owned by a foreign firm.”

In case the land is owned by a Filipino condominium corporation, no interest in the condominium may be transferred to foreigners or corporations whose capital stock is owned in excess of 40 percent by foreigners or non-Filipino citizens.

In the same token, if the common areas in a condominium project are held or owned by a Filipino condominium corporation, the transfer of units in the project may be made “only up to the point where the concomitant transfer of stockholdings in the condominium corporation” would not cause the foreign interest in the corporation to exceed 40 percent of its capital stock.

Although the SEC did not state the consequences of violation of the nationality rules on the ownership of real property in the country, it is noteworthy to mention that, under existing laws, that infraction could lead to the forfeiture of the unlawfully acquired property without the benefit of restitution of whatever money that may have been paid and, worse, prosecution of the parties who participated in the commission of the prohibited act.

(For feedback, write to rpalabrica@inquirer.com.ph.)


Follow Us


Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://business.inquirer.net/?p=85536

Tags: condominium ownership , Condominiums , Philippines , property , Real Estate

  • intsikbeho

    first, i wonder which developer the article is talking about? alpha land? i wonder who else is largely owned by foreigners. 

    • archerfan

      you dont have to look far if you want know which is largely owned by foreigners.  all companies that was acquired by MVP’s first pacific is now owned by foreigners.  MVP is just a dummy by first pacific. 

  • mark1205

    The government should start interfering with the REAL ESTATE boom the country is experiencing. There might be so much of the oversupply of units in the next couple of years when all these condominiums are finished especially for the rental market. At least real estate developers should ask for down payments.

  • neverwint3r

    the government(or senate?) should already abolish this law which forbids foreigners from owning land and/or property. it’s so obsolete.

    for one thing, since almost 15-18%(18 million not including undocumented) of the country’s population work abroad as either ofws or contractors, many of them has foreign citizenship already. so this also works against us.

    i’m sure many filipinos abroad wants to invest in a condo unit or two. me and a few friends of mine for example, are really interested. marami merong double, triple citizenship. doing this would really spur a construction and economic boom beneficial for the country.

    • intsikbeho

      i disagree. the law in place protects the rights of filipinos (including you regardless of your dual citizenship) to own land in their own country. abolishing this law would essentially open up the property market to the entire world, this is not america, russia, or china with vasts lands to offer. we are but a kapuput nation of islands filled with forests, our lands are very limited. 

      the rate of construction boom at the moment is quite high already. condominiums are varied from high to entry level values. as far as i know you and your friends can go ahead and purchase condos as you desire, i do not understand what is stopping you. 

      if our lands are openly offered to foreigners, you can say goodbye to dreaming of having your own single detach house within the metropolis because prices of these lands as it is have already skyrocketed due to the construction boom and due to the floodings. 

      unless if you want be like hongkong or singapore where you pay something like 50million pesos for a 3 bedroom condo and wanting a single detach house is pretty much equivalent to wanting to live on the moon.

      • Jun Tuazon

        Most of the big businesses in the Philippines owned by foreigners are using Filipino dummies to circumvent this archaic law.Kaya di mawala ang bigtime graft si Pinoy puhunan laway.Who do you think are in their right mind consider investing in a country where there is no protection of their investment,there should be at least a 99 year lease for foreigners,at least this way they don’t have to resort into dummies who’s interest is only their own.Even smaller countries like Singapore offers freehold ownership to foreigners.Owning your own house depends not only on availability but mostly on the capacity or ability to own.BTW what forests are you refering to,most of these forests are gone and it is the influential & powerful people (politicians,military) the culprit.

      • intsikbeho

        big businesses can use dummies all they want but they are not circumventing anyone, they are merely taking on a huge risks of ownership. thats not the point, if they want to risks their money on dummy corps hoping to turn a profit it does not matter because at the end of they day the philippines still owns these lands and it still serves the purpose of limiting land ownership to filipino citizens. 

        lease contracts are lease contracts. length of lease is between the two parties involved with whatever investment program is being planned provided it is beneficial for both entities to go into. you and i have no business saying it requires at least 99 years. 

        Your capacity and ability to own land with a house is directly connected and dependent with availability. you seem to fail to see this point which renders the whole argument moot. 

        smaller countries like Singapore is exactly my point. they have freehold ownership to foreigners, that is why you pay greenhills elite subdivision equivalent values for rent and purchase price for cramped singapore condo living which is not a good thing. 

        what benefit do you expect to get from this anyway? sure the country would benefit. but what would you yourself be getting? i just dont want to wake up one day and see the filipino people having absolutely no way of acquiring land in their own country and whats worst is that the land that they stand on is not even owned by their fellow country men. God forbid china buys swaths of lands in the philippines

    • jhujaejyt

      Say your numbers are correct…. should we sacrifice the 82% to please the 18%….

      Wave your other passports (citizenship) as you please, but not to the expense of Filipinos ….



Copyright © 2013, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • LP faces uphill climb in Northern, Central Luzon
  • Remaining Senate winners proclaimed
  • In a change of heart, Pimentel now wants proclamation
  • Remaining Senate winners to be proclaimed
  • Alvarez humbles Mitra in Palawan
  • Sports

  • US training pays off as returning San Beda nips FEU at Filoil Flying V
  • UE draws perfect game from Olivarez to thwart UST
  • Adamson bests CSB on Jericho Cruz’s 25-point burst
  • Report: Michael Phelps planning comeback
  • Former lawyer says OJ Simpson knew about guns
  • Lifestyle

  • Make the good choice with Android Handsets
  • Caribbean talks conservation on Branson’s island
  • My (forced) Boracay summer of 2013
  • Daisy Hontiveros Avellana–Why she will always be the ‘First Lady of Philippine Theater’
  • ‘The only thing wrong with the Filipino audience is that there isn’t enough of it’
  • Entertainment

  • Banner year for PH indie films in Cannes
  • Vin Diesel slow and curious in Manila
  • ‘Star Trek’s’ latest installment takes viewers on a roller-coaster ride
  • Hits and misses in midterm polls’ TV coverage
  • Paraluman and other ‘singular’ screen wonders
  • Business

  • World hypertension day: Know your numbers
  • Mining output plunged 18% in 2012
  • Stocks continue to decline
  • AUB debuts strong on PSE
  • SM launches Aura project
  • Technology

  • Hong Kong launches first electric taxis
  • DepEd website now up and normal
  • Report: Yahoo nearing $1.1B acquisition of Tumblr
  • ‘Sonic’ video games coming to Nintendo
  • ‘Hatchet hitchhiker’ arrested in US murder
  • Opinion

  • Bolder and bigger
  • Shell shock
  • Passing the election test again
  • Of proclamations and dynasties
  • Our cherished gift
  • Global Nation

  • De Lima appeals for calm as NBI completes probe into Taiwanese fisherman’s killing
  • Mexico violence claims hundreds of US lives
  • Malacañang rejects Taiwan ‘murder’ claims
  • Foreign ships harass mayor of disputed isle
  • Filipino workers suffer harassment in Taiwan
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved
    skinner left
    skinner right