US orders 149 airport towers shut due to budget cuts


Landing and taxi runways are seen from the air-traffic control tower at the Salisbury-Ocean City: Wicomico Regional Airport in Salisbury, Maryland, on March 21, 2013. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) ordered the shutdown of air-traffic control towers at 149 small airports due to budget constraints after the implementation of the “sequester” spending cuts. AFP/Jim WATSON

WASHINGTON—The US Federal Aviation Administration ordered the shutdown of air-traffic control towers at 149 small airports due to budget constraints after the implementation of the “sequester” spending cuts.

Another 40 towers that were facing closure will remain open, either because shutting them “would have a negative impact on the national interest,” or because they enjoy separate budgeting support, the FAA said.

“We heard from communities across the country about the importance of their towers and these were very tough decisions,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement.

“Unfortunately we are faced with a series of difficult choices that we have to make to reach the required cuts under sequestration.”

The FAA is being forced to excise $637 million from its current budget under the sequester, which required the government to slice $85 billion from spending over the seven months beginning March in an effort to rapidly bring down the federal deficit.

LaHood warned last month that, in addition to the tower closures, FAA staff, including flight control staff, would be subject to furloughs, or mandated unpaid leave, of up to four days a month beginning in April as a cost-saving measure.

The FAA and airlines have warned that the closures, which begin on April 7, could slow flight traffic around the country, especially during the busy summer season.

The airports affected are generally low-traffic local facilities, though some feed traffic into larger hubs.

But the FAA said some communities could assume the cost of their own on-site air-traffic control services.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • kwangkwang


  • DakuAkongUtin

    NO more money ang tate. Inabuso sa ugali nilang magaspal at magastos. And it will only get worse in time.

    • Crazy_horse101010

      keep hoping. and dreaming american hater. pity the world when that happens wheres the philippines going to sell their products china no more money but the still give to the philippines

    • ReneV

      the closures only affect the local, community and executive airports not the international ones like SFO, LA, JFK and La Guardia (for example). my small community of 3500 people in northern california even has a local airport but more for pleasure and rescue craft. of all small airports such as ours spread over 50 states only 149 will be shut down and only because they are not really used as much.

      • Crazy_horse101010

        i lived up there to but our town was about 20000 and had flights to the bay. and i believe it was staying open. daku is a american hater who wants north korea to nuke america.

  • dodong1

    parang sa mga airport ng Pilipinas walang traffic controller pagdating ng gabi..kaya karamihan ng airport sa Pinas sarado sa gabi…

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos