Sale of Ilijan power in spot market risky for consumers | Inquirer Business

Sale of Ilijan power in spot market risky for consumers

/ 05:01 AM October 09, 2017

The Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corp.’s (PSALM) insistence on San Miguel Corp.-run Ilijan power plant to trade on the spot market instead of through long-term supply deals exposes consumers to price volatility, according to SMC president Ramon S. Ang.

Ang said in a statement the state-run PSALM’s mandate was to shield consumers from wild swings in prices and not put them at risk.

He said that, in the first place, the 1,200-megawatt Ilijan plant in Batangas was a baseload power plant intended to run round-the-clock to help address the minimum electricity demand in the grid.

ADVERTISEMENT

SMC unit South Premier Power Corp. (SPPC) operates the Ilijan plant through an independent power producer administration agreement (IPPA) struck with PSALM in 2010.

FEATURED STORIES

“The Ilijan power station is used to continuously supply electricity to the grid including hours when the demand is high,” said Ang, who is also SMC chief operating officer.

“If we sold to the WESM (wholesale electricity spot market), small consumers would have to pay higher electricity bills,” he added. “Even businesses, which are the largest consumer of energy, would suffer.”

Ang said electricity trading at the WESM had seen spikes over the years, resulting in added burden to consumers who shoulder high electricity charges.

The SMC president noted that price volatility at the spot market was especially marked during November and December 2013 when rates reached as high as P15.56 a kilowatt-hour. Spot prices have since gone down to less than P3 a kWh.

Ang was taking issue on “PSALM’s continuing argument that SPPC should have sold its generated power to the WESM” instead of to Manila Electric Co., with which the company has a standing regulator-approved supply agreement.

Ang said PSALM insisted that Ilijan could have optimized revenues by selling to WESM, especially during the price spikes in 2013.

ADVERTISEMENT

He said PSALM’s position resulted in two different interpretations of the IPPA agreement provisions on how the generation payments should be computed.

Ang said PSALM continued to claim that the SPPC had unpaid obligations. But he said in an earlier interview that the company already paid P239 billion in fees as of August 2017.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Business

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.