DOJ dismisses smuggling case vs Phoenix Petroleum | Inquirer Business

DOJ dismisses smuggling case vs Phoenix Petroleum

By: - Reporter / @T2TupasINQ
/ 12:32 AM November 28, 2012

PHOTO FROM PHOENIXPHILIPPINES.COM

MANILA, Philippines—The Department of Justice (DoJ) dismissed the smuggling case against a leading independent oil industry Phoenix Petroleum Philippines Inc.

In a resolution, dated Nov. 16, the DoJ said there is not enough evidence to file a case against Phoenix for violation of the Tariff and Customs Code of the Philippines.

Article continues after this advertisement

On May 2011, the Bureau of Customs filed P5.990-billion smuggling case against Phoenix for non-payment of excise and value-added taxes, non-submission of import documents.

FEATURED STORIES

But the resolution also stated that Phoenix was able to submit documents, which proves that “there could be no unlawful importation…as borne out by the evidence on record.

“The subject shipments passed through the customs house according to the standard procedure, where the specified entry form together with other documents required by law and regulations have been filed and accepted,” the DoJ resolution stated.

Article continues after this advertisement

Documents submitted by Phoenix include manual and computerized Import Entry and Internal Revenue Declarations (IEIRDS), bills of lading, commercial invoices, statement of settlement of duties and taxes, authority to release imported goods, load port survey reports and discharge port surveys.

Article continues after this advertisement

“In the instant case, there isno gainsaying that Phoenix has fully paid the duties, taxes and fees on the subject importations,” the DoJ stated.

Article continues after this advertisement

The DoJ added that complainant filed a motion to reopen preliminary investigation to submit additional documentary evidence but no documents were attached to the motion nor a specific description of the documents they intend to submit.

“The unsupported motion, which correctly denied by the Prosecutor General, only bolsters our findings that complainant has no additional documents to discredit those submitted by respondents,” the DoJ added.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Jurisprudence abounds that he who alleges has the burden of proof. In the instant case, complainant failed to discharge that burden. Accordingly, we have to sustain the dismissal of the above entitled complaint,” the DoJ said.

In 2009, Phoenix was ranked 211th among the countries top 10,000 corporations.

Early this year, Phoenix Petroleum Philippines was recognized by the BoC as among the country’s top importers for 2011.

BoC records showed Phoenix Petroleum Philippines emerged as the Top 7 importer after paying a total of P3.69 billion in taxes to the government. The Top 3 importers were Petron, Shell, and Chevron respectively. Total Philippines was at Top 6 narrowly edging Phoenix with total tax payments of P3.96 billion.

However, in the independents category, Phoenix Petroleum was the No. 1 Importer nationwide after Seaoil and Unioil rounded up the 14th and 15th spots respectively.

In a statement, Phoenix said “we are ecstatic that the case has been dismissed knowing fully well that we have complete documents to prove our position and appreciate that the Department of Justice had given more weight to these documents.”
“We look forward to continue supporting the collection efforts of the government by paying more taxes as our business grow in the future,” lawyer Raymond Zorrilla, Phoenix’s vice president for external affairs said in a text message.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Originally posted at 06:51  pm |Tuesday, November 27, 2012

TAGS: Bureau of Customs, Business, News, oil imports, oil industry, petroleum products, Phoenix Petroleum Philippines Inc.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.