Big banks all pass the Federal Reserve's stress tests

Big banks all pass the Federal Reserve’s stress tests

But the tests were less vigorous this year
/ 10:47 AM June 28, 2025

Logo of the Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve

(FILES) The seal of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is seen at the Federal Reserve in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP)

NEW YORK — All the major banks passed the Federal Reserve’s annual “stress tests” of the financial system, the central bank said Friday. But the test conducted by the central bank was notably less vigorous than it had been in previous years.

All 22 banks tested this year would have remained solvent and above the minimum thresholds to continue to operate. The Fed found so, despite absorbing roughly $550 billion in theoretical losses. 

Article continues after this advertisement

In the Fed’s scenario, there would be less of a rise in unemployment and less of a severe economic contraction. There would also be less of a drop in commercial real estate prices, less of a drop in housing prices. These were among other metrics compared to what they tested in 2024.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: US banks sue Fed over ‘opaque’ stress tests

All of these less harmful, but simulated, drops mean there would be less damage to these banks’ balance sheets and less risk of these banks potentially failing. Since the banks passed the 2024 tests, it was expected that the banks would pass the 2025 tests.

“Large banks remain well capitalized and resilient to a range of severe outcomes,” said Michelle Bowman, the bank’s vice chair for supervision, in a statement. An appointee of President Trump, Bowman became the Fed’s vice chair of supervision earlier this month.

The Fed said it went with a less vigorous test because the global economy has weakened since last year. Therefore, the test tends to weaken. 

Article continues after this advertisement

Why the test for big banks were less vigorously

Further, the bank said previous tests had shown “unintended volatility” in the results. Also, it plans to seek public and industry comment to adjust stress tests in future years.

The Fed also chose to not test the banks as heavily on their exposure to private equity assets. It argued that private equity assets are typically held for the long term and are not typically sold at times of distress.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Fed also didn’t test for any bank exposure to private credit. This is a $2 trillion asset class that even Fed researchers themselves have observed to be growing alarmingly quickly. 

READ: Independent BSP chief needed

The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston recently pointed out that private credit could be a systemic risk to the financial system under a severe adverse scenario. This is exactly what the stress tests are supposed to test for.

There was no wording or phrasing in the Fed’s press release, reports or methodology about testing or measuring private credit or private debt in this year’s test. The Fed did do what it calls an “exploratory analysis” of the private credit market. This concluded the major banks were “generally well-positioned” to withstand losses in the private credit market. That analysis was entirely separate and not part of this year’s test.

The Fed’s “stress tests” were created after the 2008 financial crisis as a way to gauge whether the nation’s “too big to fail” banks could withstand another financial crisis like the one that happened nearly 20 years ago. 

The Fed simulates a scenario

The tests are effectively an academic exercise. The Fed simulates a scenario in the global economy and measures what that scenario would do to bank balance sheets.

The 22 banks that are tested are the biggest names in the business. Examples are JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. They hold hundreds of billions of dollars in assets and have wide-ranging businesses that touch every part of the US and global economy.

Under this year’s hypothetical scenario, a major global recession would have caused a 30-percent decline in commercial real estate prices. There would also have been a 33 percent decline in housing prices. 

The unemployment rate would rise to 10 percent and stock prices would fall 50 percent. In 2024, the hypothetical scenario was a 40-percent decline in commercial real estate prices. It also has a 55-percent decline in stock prices and a 36-percent decline in housing prices.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

With their passing grades, the major banks will be allowed to issue dividends to shareholders and buy back shares of stock to return proceeds to investors. Those dividend plans will be announced next week.

TAGS: ``stress test’’, banking system, US Federal Reserve

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2025 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.