Government sticks to yearly three-month fishing ban

Government sticks to yearly three-month fishing ban

/ 09:40 PM December 17, 2024

Government sticks to yearly three-month fishing ban

INQUIRER FILES

The government is sticking to the yearly implementation of the temporary fishing ban in major fishing grounds in the Philippines amid calls to lift the “closed fishing season.”

In a statement over the weekend, the Department of Agriculture (DA) and the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) said this policy aims to replenish fish stocks while securing the country’s food security in the long run.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: West PH Sea: Gov’t exhausting all efforts amid fish catch drop – BFAR

FEATURED STORIES

The three-month fishing ban is implemented yearly in key fishing areas to protect target fish species during their peak spawning period and address other concerns such as overfishing and climate change.

Earlier, fishers’ group Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas urged the BFAR to “refrain from placing” the country’s major fishing grounds under this measure as it creates an “artificial shortage” of fish resulting in importation.

Excuse to import

“The closed fishing season creates an artificial shortage that justifies the importation of tons of fish. Ultimately, fishers are incurring losses because the value of their catch declines as the market is flooded with imported fish,” the group said.

However, BFAR Executive Director Isidro Velayo Jr. defended this policy, saying that it is backed by scientific studies and local consultations.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Fish species like sardines, mackerel, and round scad spawn heavily during these months. For instance, [fishing for] sardines in Zamboanga Peninsula peaks from November to February. Protecting spawning areas during this period allows stocks to recover,” Velayo said.

Agriculture Secretary Francisco Tiu Laurel Jr. said this critical conservation measure supports both fisherfolk and consumers by ensuring a sustainable fish production nationwide and any importation during the fishing moratorium is not a replacement for the local industry.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Importation addresses temporary supply gaps caused by the closed-fishing season or events like typhoons. It complements, not replaces, local fish production to keep prices stable,” Tiu Laurel said.

The DA had authorized the importation of 30,000 metric tons (MT) of frozen small pelagic fish in the fourth quarter of 2024 to plug the projected supply gap during the fishing ban.

Last month, it allowed the importation of an additional 8,280 MT of frozen small pelagic fish for wet markets to alleviate the impact of recent typhoons on domestic supply.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The agency said the government provides fuel subsidies, livelihood programs and aquaculture assistance to support fisherfolk affected by typhoons. INQ

TAGS: Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR), DA, Fishing

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2025 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.