Legal obstacles hamper adoption of genetically modified crops

Legal obstacles hamper adoption of genetically modified crops in PH

/ 08:29 AM November 17, 2024

Legal obstacles hamper adoption of genetically modified crops in PH

Graphic shows the top producers of genetically modified crops in the world. A study said on Monday, June 10, 2013 that more pest species are becoming resistant to the most popular type of genetically modified, insect-repellent crops, but not in areas where farmers follow expert advice.

Updated on November 19, 2024 at 1:37 p.m.

Despite solidifying its position as a leader in biotechnology in Southeast Asia, regulatory hurdles stemming from legal woes hampered the adoption of genetically modified crops in the country.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Philippines continues to be a leader in biotechnology in Southeast Asia, having been the first in the region to have a regulatory framework on genetically engineered (GE) crops,” the US Department of Agriculture’s Foreign Agricultural Service said in its Agricultural Biotechnology Annual report.

FEATURED STORIES

So far, biosafety permits for commercial propagation have been issued for the following commodities – corn (2002), golden rice (2021), eggplant (2022) and cotton (2023).

The area planted with GE corn has expanded by more than 6,500 percent to 709,000 hectares as of February this year from only 10,600 hectares in 2003, equivalent to about 85 percent of the total corn area in the country.

Article continues after this advertisement

Amid this progress, the Court of Appeals (CA) halted the commercial release of golden rice, locally known as Malusog Rice, and Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) eggplant in April this year with the issuance of the writ of kalikasan due to environment and public health concerns.

Article continues after this advertisement

Amid this progress, a ruling by the Court of Appeals (CA) halted the commercial release of golden rice, locally known as Malusog Rice, and Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) eggplant in April this year with the issuance of the writ of kalikasan due to environment and public health concerns.

Article continues after this advertisement

It revoked the biosafety permit for commercial propagation of golden rice and directed the University of the Philippines Los Baños to halt activities related to the commercial release of Bt eggplant.

The appellate court granted the writ of kalikasan in favor of petitioners led by Magsasaka at Siyentipiko para sa Pag-unlad Agrikultura (Masipag) and Greenpeace Southeast Asia.

Article continues after this advertisement

A writ of kalikasan is a legal remedy for persons whose constitutional right to “a balanced and healthful ecology” is violated.

The PhilRice recently said it filed a petition for review on certiorari with a request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction before the Supreme Court, seeking to reverse the CA’s decision.

Golden Rice is the first genetically modified rice variety for improved nutrition developed by PhilRice with the International Rice Research Institute, which contains additional levels of beta-carotene which the body converts into vitamin A.

Bt eggplant, on the other hand, contains natural protein from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis, making it resistant to eggplant fruit-and-shoot borer.

The report also highlighted other strides made by the Philippines, such as being the first in the region to issue regulatory frameworks on GE crops.

It covers the cultivation and regulation of plants and plant products derived from the using plant breeding innovations.

“The country has also drafted the regulations on animal biotechnology but the policy has not been released,” it said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

According to the foreign agency, the draft covers genetically modified fish and other aquatic resources, domesticated animals and biological products used for animal husbandry for veterinary purposes, and biological agents used for biocontrol.

TAGS: Agriculture, genetically modified crops, supreme court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2025 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.