Economists push back on Harris price gouging plan
Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris, center, and second gentleman Doug Emhoff, right, greet members of the Aliquippa High School football team during a campaign stop at their school, Sunday, Aug. 18, 2024, in Aliquippa, Pa. (AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson)
Washington, United States — Kamala Harris’s price gouging policy has been criticized by economists and analysts, who say it is an uncompetitive proposal that could end up hurting, and not helping, US consumers.
Harris, the Democratic nominee for president, announced the policy last week as part of a raft of populist proposals which included a $6,000-a-year tax credit for families with newborn children and a $10,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers.
If elected President, Harris would work with Congress to advance “the first-ever federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries,” her campaign said in a statement.
READ: Kamala Harris woos voters with price-cutting plans
The proposals would look to set “clear rules of the road” to stop big corporations from running up “excessive” profits on food and groceries, and beef up state and federal regulatory powers to penalize rule-breakers.
Article continues after this advertisementWhile popular with the Democratic base, the price gouging plans elicited a fierce reaction from Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, who is running against Harris in November’s elections.
Article continues after this advertisement“Kamala will implement SOVIET Style Price Controls,” he wrote in a social media post a day after the proposals were published.
Supporters of the policy say it has been mischaracterized and misunderstood.
“When there is more concentration in an industry, we have seen much greater increases in the profit margins,” US Senator Elizabeth Warren said in an interview with CNBC on Friday.
READ: Kamala Harris vows to be ‘president for all Americans’ in convention climax
The Harris campaign did not respond to a request for comment. But several US media organizations, including the Washington Post, reported that the Harris campaign sees the policy as an attempt to elevate existing state-level rules on price gouging to the federal level.
What price gouging?
A global inflationary surge at the tail-end of the Covid-19 pandemic contributed to a sharp rise in the cost of everyday items across the United States.
Consumer inflation has eased dramatically since peaking at more than nine percent in 2022. But Americans are still contending with an overall price increase of just over 20 percent since Joe Biden took office, according to data from the US Lab or Department.
However, “very little” of that increase is down to price gouging, Oxford Economics chief US economist Ryan Sweet told AFP.
READ: Harris campaign says it raised $540M in just over a month
Instead, Sweet points to a pandemic-fueled supply shock, and an increase in demand for goods and services spurred — in part — by generous federal support for households during the pandemic.
“What this gouging does is pivot the blame from the Biden administration, which Harris was part of, to corporations,” said Gary Hufbauer, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
“It’s a pretty successful political argument,” he told AFP. “It has no economic basis.”
‘Penny business’
The retail business is notoriously tough, with profit margins often in the low single digits — in stark contrast to higher-margin sectors like tech.
“Is there a more competitive space than retail?” Target chief executive Brian Cornell said in an interview with CNBC on Wednesday that touched on Harris’s price gouging plans.
“It is a penny business, and it’s a very competitive space, and we provide the value consumers are looking for,” he added.
But for people struggling with the cost of living, it’s a difficult argument to make.
“People see that gasoline prices are higher than they were a few years ago, food prices are going to be higher than they were a few years ago,” said Sweet, from Oxford Economics.
“But we’re not going back down to the prices that we saw pre-pandemic,” he added.
That’s because easing inflation does not translate into lower sticker prices at the grocery store.
Instead, when wages increase faster than inflation — as they have been for well over a year now — the cost of those items relative to wages declines over time.
But it’s a slow process.
The Federal Reserve appears increasingly confident that it is winning its battle to bring inflation back down to its long-term target of two percent.
On Friday, Fed chair Jerome Powell said “the time has come” to start lowering interest rates, lifting expectations of a rate cut next month.
“There’s clear evidence that businesses’ pricing power has started to diminish,” said Sweet.
“I think over time, as inflation gets back down to the Fed’s target, this discussion of price gouging is going to start to fade to the background,” he added.
