Vietnam parliament OKs global minimum corporate tax | Inquirer Business

Vietnam parliament approves global minimum corporate tax

/ 11:33 AM November 29, 2023

Tourists walk past Vietnam's National Assembly

Tourists walk past Vietnam’s National Assembly (Parliament) building in Hanoi, Vietnam, Sept 16, 2016. REUTERS/Kham/File photo

HANOI  –Vietnam‘s parliament decided on Wednesday to raise the effective tax rate on multinationals including Samsung to 15 percent from Jan. 1, and delayed measures to offset the higher levy in a potential blow to the foreign investments the economy relies on.

The parliament approved the higher tax rate as part of a global tax reform, and said the government would work on specific incentives in 2024.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The National Assembly is not issuing a separate resolution on investment incentives at this time,” said Le Quang Manh, head of the assembly’s financial commission.

FEATURED STORIES

Vietnam‘s corporate income tax is already set at 20 percent, but it has offered for years much lower effective rates to large foreign investors.

With the new rate, 122 foreign companies will face a steep increase in their tax costs, according to a document prepared by the government, which estimated the additional intake for the state at 14.6 trillion dong ($601 million) a year.

A large portion of the additional tax bill is expected to be shouldered by Samsung alone. Its multi-billion-dollar revenues from its factories are the largest in the country, according to one person involved in the preparation of the new incentives.

The South Korean electronics giant, which assembles half of its smartphones in Vietnam, paid as little as 5.1 percent in tax in 2019 in one of the Vietnamese provinces where it has operations.

READ: Vietnam eyes multi-million-dollar handouts to Samsung, others to offset global tax -source

Samsung did not immediately respond to Reuters queries on the tax. The Korean Chamber of Commerce in Vietnam said members were concerned about the new tax rate, but “none have expressed their intention to alter their investment in Vietnam“.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, Thang Vu, a tax expert at consultancy Dezan Shira, said Vietnam could see a drop in foreign investment if it did not offer “adequate alternative economic benefits” to those affected by the new tax.

Foreign investors have so far poured more than $450 billion into Vietnam, more than its GDP.

Investment conundrum

Under the draft plan published in August by the investment ministry, high-tech companies with investments of at least 12 trillion dong ($495 million) would benefit from the proposed tax offsets, which could come as cash subsidies to cover multiple costs including for training, research and infrastructure.

But the proposal has so far been delayed in parliament, where lawmakers have said they need more time to ensure it does not violate global rules and to discuss possible legal risks from investors who may not be granted access to these subsidies.

READ: Deal to force MNCs to pay at least 15% tax seen marred by loopholes

Most companies hit by the tax may not be eligible to the new incentives under the current draft, two people familiar with internal discussions said.

The new effective tax rate is part of a global reform agreed in 2021 by more than 140 countries, under which a minimum 15 percent tax will be charged from 2024 on multinationals with annual global turnover of more than 750 million euros ($825 million), regardless of their location.

Companies and wealthy individuals have for decades legally transferred profits to low-tax or tax-free countries, but under the new regime they would have to pay the top-up levy in their home country if it is not imposed where they declare their revenues.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

($1 = 0.9092 euros)

TAGS: corporate tax, foreign investors, samsung, Vietnam

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.