Russian gold removed from some Western funds after Ukraine
Marked ingots of 99.99 percent pure gold are placed in a cart at the Krastsvetmet non-ferrous metals plant in the Siberian city of Krasnoyarsk, Russia. REUTERS/Alexander Manzyuk/File photo
LONDON – Hidden inside high-security bank vaults in London, Zurich and New York, billions of dollars’ worth of gold of Russian origin has quietly changed hands in recent months in response to Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine.
Data from 11 Western investment funds show that Russian bullion worth a total of $2.2 billion at current prices was removed from their accounts between July and November.
Funds storing gold have shrunk in recent months as rising interest rates triggered disinvestment from bullion. But the data, compiled by Reuters, shows Russian gold being removed at a significantly faster pace than that from other countries.
While a small fraction of the total amount of Russian gold held by wealth managers, this reflects a shift, with some funds saying they no longer want to hold any assets linked to Russia.
Two sources at exchange traded funds (ETFs) with hundreds of tonnes of gold said they would like to divest from metal originating in Russia. One said he had asked the bank paid to store his fund’s gold to allocate as little Russian metal as possible to it.
ETFs are among the biggest holders of bullion and many list publicly the bars they own. This means investors can see whether they have Russian gold as each bar is stamped with its origin.
“Some clients click on the bar list, see a lot of Russia and they are like, ‘Whoa, what’s going on?’,” one source said.
“Explaining it to them is difficult. We want to make the barriers to entry (to the fund) as low as possible and anything that would make them doubt that this is the right product we try to eliminate,” the source added.
Click here for a FACTBOX detailing ETF gold holdings.
‘Business as usual’
In the months after Russia invaded Ukraine, banks resisted requests from funds to remove Russian gold, fearing a sell-off that would disrupt the market.
“We didn’t want a knee jerk sell-off of all the Russian metal,” said an executive at one of the banks storing gold for ETFs, who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity.
“It’s been phased in a controlled, business as usual manner,” the executive said of the removal of Russian gold.
Funds do not have to sell their holdings as gold produced in Russia before March 7, shortly Moscow began what it calls a “special military operation” in Ukraine, does not fall under Western sanctions against Moscow, unless it is owned by a sanctioned Russian individual or company.
But sanctions do bar funds from holding new gold from Russia, which is one of the world’s biggest producers, mining around 330 tonnes a year worth $19 billion at current prices.
Two people at banks which store gold said some funds that publicly reveal the origin of what they own are worried that investors may not want them to hold Russian metal, while other owners of gold who do not publish such data are less concerned.
Russian gold removed from such funds was often reassigned to other owners in the same location, the bankers said.
But some has been shipped to Asia, where demand has been strong in recent months, according to bankers, analysts and customs data.
The amount of gold stored in vaults in London monitored by the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) fell by 468 tonnes, or 5 percent, in the first 11 months of the year. British and Swiss customs data show huge shipments to China, India and other countries in Asia and the Middle East.
Gold flows
Reuters analyzed the holdings of eleven of the biggest ETFs.
These between them held almost 2,300 tons of gold in late November worth $130 billion, stored in London, Zurich and New York, around two thirds of all the gold owned by ETFs globally, according to the World Gold Council, which tracks the sector.
Most of the gold held by ETFs is managed by JP Morgan, HSBC and ICBC Standard.
ICBC Standard is the smallest, holding around 100 tonnes of gold for the eleven funds tracked by Reuters, and has moved the fastest, reducing Russian gold by 47 percent in those funds while increasing non-Russian gold by 16 percent since mid-July.
HSBC, which stored around 1,100 tonnes of gold for the tracked funds, reduced Russian gold in their accounts by 20 percent since July and non-Russian gold by 10 percent.
JP Morgan, which stored around 1,050 tons of gold for the funds, trimmed Russian gold by 13 percent and non-Russian gold by 9 percent.
All three banks declined to comment.
Of the funds, eight had cut the proportion of Russian gold in their stockpiles since July, while two, run by Amundi and WisdomTree, had shed all of their Russian metal.
Amundi and WisdomTree did not respond to requests for comment.
Since July, the total amount of Russian metal in the 11 funds has fallen 19 percent, while non-Russian gold has decreased 9 percent.
However, the two largest funds, BlackRock’s iShares Gold Trust and the World Gold Council’s SPDR Gold Shares, actually increased their proportion of Russian gold.
The WGC said its funds were guided by rules set by the London Bullion Market Association, under which pre-war Russian gold is eligible to trade. BlackRock declined to comment.
In late November, 7 percent of the bullion in the 11 funds was Russian, down from 7.8 percent in mid-July.
The shift by some ETFs away from Russian gold further fragments a market where traditionally all bars were equal.
Some funds are already stocking only newer gold bars which they say are more responsibly sourced than older ones.
But not many large funds expect to be able to reliably claim to be free of Russian gold anytime soon because ETFs typically draw metal from the wider market and must take eligible gold even if it is Russian, though they can later seek to remove it.
“In theory they could come to us with 100 percent Russian bars and we would have to accept them,” the ETF executive said.
“It’s a long journey. I have no expectation that there will be zero Russian gold anywhere in the near future.”
