Harmonizing AmBisyon Natin 2040 and Dream Philippines 2040 | Inquirer Business
MAPping the Future

Harmonizing AmBisyon Natin 2040 and Dream Philippines 2040

/ 04:01 AM January 31, 2022

(Conclusion)

The Dream Philippines 2040 Roadmap, as currently being drafted, will eventually include: 1) a National Governance Charter (or statements of National Vision, Mission, Values); 2) the Eight Strategic Perspectives for National Development; 3) the Strategic Objectives corresponding to the Eight Strategic Perspectives and; 4) the Country Performance Scorecard.

There was a need to use a strategy formulation, execution framework and methodology that have been successfully used by governments and even large corporations here and abroad. Institute for Solidarity in Asia (ISA) and its sister advocacy for corporate governance, the Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD) had been using the Robert Kaplan-David Norton Balanced Scorecard framework for strategy design and execution in the last 20 years and this approach was used in drafting Dream Philippines (DPH) 2040.

ADVERTISEMENT

Year of reckoning

There are two reasons for the use of 2040 as the vision year. First, it is the same timeframe for the AmBisyon Natin 2040. It was felt that using the same vision year of the current government plan and a private sector-initiated strategic plan will facilitate alignment. Second, 2040 is three administrations into the future: 2022-2028, 2028-2034 and 2034-2040. This avoids dependence on personalities.

FEATURED STORIES

DPH 2040 starts with a proposed set of core values observed and desired among Filipinos. These are: Maka-Diyos, Maka-Bayan, Maka-Tao, Maka-Pamilya, Maka-Komunidad and Maka-Kalikasan (Translated: Love of God, Love of country, Respect for the individual, Love of family, Sense of community, and Protection of God’s other Creations, i.e., the Environment).

Vision-mission

The mission of the Philippine nation is very clearly defined in the preamble of the present Constitution and therefore was adopted in toto in DPH 2040. The preamble states: “Imploring the aid of the Almighty, we seek to build a just and humane society and establish a government that shall embody our ideals and aspirations to promote the common good, conserve and develop our patrimony, and to secure to ourselves and our posterity the blessings of independence and democracy under the rule of law and a regime of truth, justice, love, equality and peace.”

The vision for DPH 2040 is the consolidation, integration, harmonization and synthesis primarily of the original Philippines 2030 Roadmap and AmBisyon Natin 2040. The draft of this vision statement is as follows: “By 2040, The Philippines shall be One Nation under God, one community of patriotic and responsible citizens living in a connected society characterized by justice, peace and security, free from poverty and corruption and fully participating in the fruits of inclusive and sustainable development.”

Development of a nation has many dimensions and perspectives. In DPH 2040, eight strategic perspectives, which coincide with the eight rays of the sun in the Philippine flag were identified: 1) human resources, 2) natural resources, 3) technological resources, 4) financial and economic resources, 5) political infrastructure, 6) physical infrastructure, 7) cultural and social infrastructure, and 8) spiritual and moral foundations.

Each of these eight strategic perspectives were then subjected to in-depth discussions to determine the strategic objectives that should be formulated to address the various aspects of these national development perspectives.

The draft DPH 2040 Roadmap proposes 23 strategic objectives. There are other objectives that can be developed but in the interest of digestibility, these objectives were kept to a minimum.

ADVERTISEMENT

And just to test whether the strategic objectives are aligned with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nation, a matrix was created and it shows that indeed the strategic objectives address or are aligned with the 17 SDGs.

The long road

The challenge to the incoming administration, if they will consider the DPH 2040, will be to build the Country Performance Scorecard, which will show how the proposed 23 strategic objectives in the eight strategic areas or perspectives can be achieved. This will require adoption of strategic initiatives that can be measured for monitoring purposes. Baselines (2021) will have to be established and targets for the year 2040 will need to be adopted with milestones or base camps for 2034 and 2028. A strategic plan without a performance scorecard will be a useless document. The Country Performance Scorecard is where the rubber meets the road. If crafted and executed properly, the scorecard will help ensure that the country vision for 2040 will be achieved.

This draft DPH 2040 is just that: a draft, a talking paper. It has to be vetted by a group of citizens representing key sectors in Philippine society— the poor, youth, labor, women, academe, media, religious, business, civil society, among others. The three branches of government (executive, legislative and judiciary) and the uniformed services will also need to be consulted for their inputs.

When completed, DPH 2040 will be submitted to the new administration but it has to be harmonized with the government’s AmBisyon Natin 2040 and the moving five-year Philippine Development Plan. National Economic Development Authority, with proper leadership, together with inputs from the private sector, should be able to harmonize these strategic plans and ensure the attainment of, as presidential candidate Vice President Leni Robredo said … “ang Pilipinas ng ating panaginip (Our Dream Philippines).” INQ

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

This article reflects the personal opinion of the author and not the official stand of the Management Association of the Philippines or MAP. The author is cochair for governance of the MAP committee on ESG. He is also vice chair of ISA and Center for Excellence in Governance and former chair of Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD). Feedback at [email protected] and [email protected].

TAGS: Business

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.