Gov’t purchase of COVID-19 goods, services without public bidding allowed after Bayanihan 2 expires | Inquirer Business

Gov’t purchase of COVID-19 goods, services without public bidding allowed after Bayanihan 2 expires

By: - Reporter / @bendeveraINQ
/ 04:14 PM December 16, 2020

MANILA, Philippines—Even as the Bayanihan to Recover as One Act lapses on Saturday (Dec. 19), government agencies can still fast-track purchases of goods and services for COVID-19 response through negotiated procurement without public bidding.

In a Dec. 15 memorandum, Government Procurement Policy Board (GPPB) Executive Director Rowena Candice M. Ruiz said procuring agencies still have until Dec. 19 to issue notices of award for their purchases under Bayanihan 2.

These included supply deals with local firms under the domestic preference policy for COVID-19-related goods under Bayanihan 2.

Article continues after this advertisement

After Dec. 19, Ruiz said agencies are allowed to purchase items for COVID-19 response under the Government Procurement Reform Act, or Republic Act No. 9184, but “taking into consideration” the expiry or validity of their funds “under respective budget laws.”

FEATURED STORIES

As the country remained under a prolonged state of public health emergency due to the pandemic, agencies may also resort to negotiated procurement in lieu of public bidding to quickly buy their supplies to fight COVID-19.

President Rodrigo Duterte earlier extended the effectivity of his declaration of a national state of calamity for the COVID-19 crisis.

Article continues after this advertisement

Emergency procurement had been allowed to expedite purchase of essential goods as the government scrambled to buy medical equipment, medicines and personal protective equipment (PPEs) at the start of the longest and most stringent COVID-19 lockdown in the region.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Emergency procurement covers goods, civil works projects, and consulting services,” said Ruiz’s memo.

Article continues after this advertisement

It also covered “lease of real property or venue such as those for use as quarantine centers, evacuation sites, medical relief, and aid distribution locations, warehousing facilities, or similar temporary disaster or emergency response facility are included as well,” the memo said.

It said it was up to the “procuring entity” to determine if there was a need to set aside public bidding in favor of negotiated purchases.

Article continues after this advertisement

Agencies in a rush to purchase goods or services for COVID-19 response could also resort to “any of the alternative methods of procurement” available under the law, or RA No. 9184.

The procuring entity, the memo said, shall be “responsible for the procurement planning, which includes identification of goods and services.”

Edited by TSB
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: #COVID19PH, bidding, emergency, Health, pandemic, procurement, state of calamity

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.