ERC finds ‘operational lapses’ by Peco | Inquirer Business

ERC finds ‘operational lapses’ by Peco

05:10 AM December 05, 2019

The Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) on Wednesday said an investigation it conducted on the distribution system of Panay Electric Co. Inc. (Peco) found “apparent operational lapses” by Peco, related to numerous incidents of cable poles catching fire over the past two years.

The ERC said in a statement that it issued an order dated Nov. 26, directing Peco to explain why the distributor should not face administrative penalties or a criminal case.

According to the regulator, Peco violated the Philippine Distribution Code 2017 Edition, Amended Distribution Services and Open Access Rules, Amended Elevated Metering Center Rules, and ERC Resolution No. 12 issued in 2009 that laid down the guidelines for the accreditation of satellite laboratories of meter shops.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Based on the findings of the ERC technical team that conducted the ocular inspection on the electric distribution system of Peco, the latter committed lapses in the operations and maintenance of its distribution system thereby posing danger and risks to the lives and properties of its consumers,” ERC Chair Agnes Devanadera said.
Peco was given 15 days within receipt of the order to submit its explanation.

FEATURED STORIES

“We need to accord Peco the opportunity to explain its side before we evaluate the extent of their liability for the operational lapses that were discovered,” Devanadera said.

She said the inspection team found that Peco’s protective devices were not properly rated and designed, and that some poles were leaning and in unsafe positions.

Article continues after this advertisement

Also, the team found that some electric meters were clustered and installed in an elevated metering center without securing prior ERC approval.

Article continues after this advertisement

The team also discovered that the certificate of authority for Peco’s meter shop expired on Nov. 18, but the company has not filed the application for renewal.Earlier, Peco representatives said the power distributor had submitted a report to the ERC, which showed that not all of the 709 pole fires that the Bureau of Fire Protection recorded over the past two years involved Peco’s electric poles—and thus should not be blamed solely for the problem.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Peco, some of the poles were owned by local telecommunications companies.

The embattled distributor is fighting to maintain its business amid efforts of the Razon group’s More Power and Electric Co. to take over based on a franchise granted by Congress.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC), Panay Electric Co. Inc. (Peco)

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.