The amnesty law, after the President’s line veto | Inquirer Business
Mapping The Future

The amnesty law, after the President’s line veto

05:02 AM February 25, 2019

The legislators got slapped on their faces again with yet another line veto by the President of another significant component of his tax reform program.  This is the second time the President exercised his veto power on a TRAIN bill as if saying “don’t mess with me on this tax reform.”

The first veto was on tax privileges of regional headquarters and certain VAT exemptions.

The tax amnesty is Package 1B, an important component of the comprehensive tax reform program and is meant to supplement TRAIN 1.  It is offered as an act of grace, a clemency for past wrongdoings as one transitions to a new beginning under a new and better, but harsher tax regime for tax evaders, under TRAIN.

Article continues after this advertisement

Behind that act of clemency, the amnesty has an ulterior purpose. It is meant to be an innovative, legitimate way to collect information of a taxpayer’s belongings, beef up the government’s databank and convert that data into a useful tool for referencing going forward. Now, the government knows you.

FEATURED STORIES

And that is the reason for the veto of the whole section on general amnesty by the President. There was no provision lifting the secrecy of bank deposit for those wanting to come clean and avail of the amnesty.  The amnesty bill transmitted by the legislators to the President contained three parts—the estate tax amnesty, the general amnesty and the amnesty on delinquent accounts.  Of these, the general amnesty was vetoed.

The government felt it was useless to offer a general amnesty, giving up public funds and depriving millions of Filipinos of public service, yet getting nothing in return. The President wanted a quid-pro-quo arrangement and not a one-sided amnesty.  He wanted those bank accounts opened in exchange for giving that tax immunity.  Fair deal?

Article continues after this advertisement

As structured, the proposed general amnesty is wide in scope covering all kinds of taxes, light on the pocket for those with big tax exposures or doing business underground, and overly generous with an all-encompassing grant of immunity in exchange for payment of either 2 percent of total assets or 5 percent of net worth (as of December 2017), at the option of taxpayer.

Article continues after this advertisement

And unlike previous amnesties with a contestability period, one-year at least, the proposed amnesty does not have one.  Immunity attaches immediately upon payment of the amnesty tax and the amnesty return is given the presumption of correctness and validity once filed. Everything written in the amnesty return as self-declared by the taxpayer, no matter how erroneous or improbable, is to be taken as gospel truth by the government.  The President had to exercise his veto power, isn’t it?

Article continues after this advertisement

So, what remains after the veto?  It, still, is a good amnesty program covering estate tax and delinquent accounts.

Estate tax amnesty

Article continues after this advertisement

The estate tax amnesty covers the estates of decedents who died on or before Dec. 31, 2017, only.  Not after.  The amnesty rate is 6 percent, equal to the new estate tax rate under the TRAIN law.  All penalties, surcharges and interest penalties are condoned and it is computed at a straight 6 percent based on the decedent’s net estate, meaning, gross estate less the allowed deductions.

Assets of the estate shall be valued at fair market value at the time of death of the decedent. Likewise, the rules then prevailing at the time of death of the decedent with respect to manner of computation shall apply.  Not the TRAIN law.  For example, the increased amount of standard deduction from estate of  P5 million, and the deduction for family home of P10 million shall not apply. The prevailing rules on deduction at the time of death apply. In short, other than the 6 percent rate, the more generous deductions under the TRAIN law shall not apply.

If partial payment of estate tax had been made before, the undeclared asset can be covered by amnesty at 6 percent.  If the net estate (after deducting all the allowable deduction) is negative or that, the allowable deductions exceed the gross estate, the estate tax amnesty can still be availed by paying the minimum amount of P5,000.

If properties had been transferred in a series of mortis causa transfers, e.g. generation to generation, without the payment of estate tax, all estates of decedents through which the property passed, not just the last decedent, shall file an amnesty to get full immunity on those properties.  The provision requiring only the last decedent to file the amnesty has been vetoed by the President.

The estate tax amnesty can be enjoyed within two years from the effectivity of the implementing rules and regulations. Upon full payment of the amount due, the estate tax amnesty shall be conclusively presumed as true, correct and final.

To facilitate the transfer of properties covered by amnesty, the BIR, in coordination with other regulatory agencies such as the Registry of Deeds perhaps, and the banks (for withdrawals), is mandated to set up a system enabling the transfers of the properties to the heirs.

Amnesty on delinquent accounts

Delinquent accounts pertain to tax obligations, whether with or without assessments, that have become final, due and demandable.  These are normally referred to as collectibles or receivables of the BIR such as those covered by collection notices, warrants of distraints and levy, garnishment of bank accounts and all other summary modes of collection.

Delinquent accounts are not the same as assessments.  Assessments that are contested either administratively or with the courts within the time period allowed by law, and have not yet attained finality, are not delinquent accounts, hence, not covered by this amnesty.

The following are the amnesty rates for delinquent accounts:

On delinquencies and assessments which have become final and executory—40 percent of the basic tax assessed.  The rate of 40 percent is the same rate allowed under the Tax Code for legal compromises based on doubtful validity.  But unlike the regular compromise, you save the rigors of going through series of approvals when you avail of the amnesty.

Tax cases subject of final and executory judgement by the courts—50 percent of the basic tax assessed.

Pending criminal cases with assessments—60 percent of basic tax assessed.

Withholding agents who withheld but failed to remit—100 percent of the basic tax assessed.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The amnesty on delinquent accounts can be sought within one year from the effectivity of the implementing regulations. A notice of cancellation of assessment shall be issued by the BIR within 15 days from the acceptance of the payment form.

TAGS: Business

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.