Higher prices of alcoholic drinks loom as House panel OKs excise tax hikes  

Higher prices of alcoholic drinks loom as House panel OKs excise tax hikes  

By: - Reporter / @bendeveraINQ
/ 05:19 PM November 20, 2018

Prices of alcoholic drinks such as distilled spirits and fermented liquor are expected to increase soon after a House of Representatives panel approved Tuesday higher excise taxes, although at lower levels compared with the original proposal of the Department of Finance (DOF).

A technical working group (TWG) of the House ways and means committee green-lighted an increase of the ad valorem rate slapped on distilled spirits to 22 percent, on top of specific tax rates of P30, P35, P40, and P45 per proof liter yearly between 2019 and 2022 and a 7-percent annual hike beginning 2023.

However, the rates approved by the TWG were below the DOF’s proposal as well as House Bill (HB) No. 8286 of Sultan Kudarat Rep. Horacio Suansing Jr.

Article continues after this advertisement

Their original proposals were to increase to 25 percent of the ad valorem tax on distilled spirits. For the specific tax rates for the period 2019-2022, the DOF and Suansing had proposed P40, P45, P50, and P55 per proof liter before a 10-percent jump annually starting 2023.

FEATURED STORIES

At present, the ad valorem tax on distilled spirits stood at 20 percent per proof, while the specific tax was P22.50 per proof liter.

In the case of fermented liquor, the TWG gave its go ahead to excise tax hikes of P28 in 2019, P32 in 2020, P36 in 2021 and P40 in 2022 before an index of 7 percent yearly beginning 2023.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the DOF and HB 8286 had proposed to raise the specific tax rates slapped on fermented liquor to P40, P45, P50, and P55 from 2019 to 2022, after which the taxes will be raised by 10 percent annually from 2023 onwards.

Article continues after this advertisement

The current excise taxes for fermented liquors were P24.44 per liter, as well as a higher P34.07 if brewed and sold at microbreweries or small establishments.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a statement Tuesday, the non-government Action for Economic Reforms (AER) said the House committee also approved the shift to a unitary excise rate of P650 per bottle for sparkling wines.

The AER pointed out that the excise tax hikes approved by the committee fell below the rates and increases mandated under Republic Act (RA) No. 10351 or the Sin Tax Reform Law of 2012.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Today is a sad day for the health and well-being of the Filipino people. The alcohol tax rates approved by the committee on ways and means in the Congress will neither prevent Filipinos from being exposed to the adverse health and social effects of alcohol consumption, nor generate a significant amount of revenue that would be crucial in funding key health measures in the country,” Maricar Limpin of the group’s Action on Smoking and Health Philippines as well as head of the Philippine College of Physicians’ cluster on public health said.

“Scientific evidence now shows that alcohol consumption at any levels increases risk to cancers especially cancers of the gut. More than revenue, we are looking at alcohol tax as a health measure,” added Limpin.

For his part, former Philippine College of the Physicians president Tony Leachon noted that: “Every year, there are over 37,000 deaths that are attributable to alcohol consumption, and alcohol drinking prevalence has remained stable at over 40 percent despite the past tax increase.”

“Today’s hearing served as an opportunity to significantly increase the excise tax and discourage its use, the same way the tax increase has decreased cigarette smoking. Instead, we were given an alarmingly low tax increase, and the well-being of our countrymen remains at great risk,” Leachon added.

According to AER fiscal policy team head Jo-Ann Diosana, “it is very disappointing that the committee in charge of looking for effective revenue-generating measures chose to settle for a measure that would generate only P7.8 billion in incremental revenue, while Rep. Suansing’s bill was expected to generate around P43 billion in incremental revenue.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“It is especially alarming, because a significant funding gap still exists for the Universal Health Care (UHC) bill. Without a sustainable source of funds, we will not be able to reap the benefits of such a landmark reform,” according to Diosana, citing that earlier Department of Health (DOH) estimates showed that if passed into law, the implementation of the UHC bill will entail P164 billion in additional funds.  /kga

TAGS: alcoholic drinks, Business, business news, DoF, local news, nation, national news, News, Philippines news updates, tax

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.