Tax court asks BIR to refund P50M to San Miguel Holdings | Inquirer Business

Tax court asks BIR to refund P50M to San Miguel Holdings

/ 04:59 AM June 25, 2018

The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) has ordered the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to refund the P50.62-million surcharges it imposed on the documentary stamp tax (DST) liabilities of San Miguel Holdings Corp. (SMHC) for the year 2011.

In a 28-page decision dated June 5, the court’s Second Division partially granted the petition of SMHC — the infrastructure arm of the Ramon Ang-led San Miguel Corp. — to be refunded for the tax it paid under protest.

DST on advances

Article continues after this advertisement

The CTA, however, let the BIR keep the principal amount of P59.32 million as basic tax, saying it was proper to impose the DST on SMHC’s advances from its parent company and other affiliates.

FEATURED STORIES

The court said the Supreme Court’s July 19, 2011, decision on the case of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Filinvest Development Corp. should be retroactively applied to SMHC’s tax liabilities.

Filinvest case

Article continues after this advertisement

In the Filinvest ruling, the high tribunal declared that instructional letters and journal and cash vouchers extended by a parent company to its affiliates were loan agreements subject to the DST.

Article continues after this advertisement

Three months later, the BIR issued Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 48-2011 as guidelines to implement the high court’s decision.

The CTA said the BIR should refund the surcharges because it was not SMHC’s fault that it relied on existing court decisions and BIR rulings at the time. —VINCE F. NONATO

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: BIR, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Court of Tax Appeals, CTA, San Miguel Holdings Corp.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.