As competition watchdog, DoJ means business—De Lima | Inquirer Business

As competition watchdog, DoJ means business—De Lima

Agency pushes bill in Congress
/ 12:25 AM October 14, 2011

The Department of Justice, the government’s designated Competition Authority, is actively pushing for the passage of a law that will prevent companies from taking undue advantage of size and market position to generate windfalls while placing consumers at a disadvantage.

In a speech at the Philippine Business Conference on Thursday, Justice Secretary Leila de Lima said the DoJ would actively “craft a comprehensive competition law.”

According to De Lima, the House of Representatives’ version of the bill has already hurdled committee-level hearings, while the Senate version is now on the technical working group phase.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Since the founding of the republic, we never had a dedicated agency, unit, or office to address your competition concerns. Not surprising given that, up to today, we have yet to come up with a national competition framework and policy, to define and implement a plan of action to push … our national economic interest. Perhaps this is one project we can jumpstart,” she said before members of the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

FEATURED STORIES

In an earlier interview, Trade Secretary Gregory Domingo said the two chambers of Congress had different versions of the competition bill: the House version followed the Federal Trade Commission structure, while the Senate version was patterned after the Sherman Antitrust Act.

These should be consolidated in a way that would be acceptable to the business sector, Domingo said.

Article continues after this advertisement

While waiting for the competition law to be passed, De Lima said the DoJ would be actively performing its duties as Competition Authority under the Office of Competition.

Article continues after this advertisement

Less than five months since its creation, the OFC now has five cases in its docket, including complaints on bid-rigging, combinations in restraint of trade, and abuse of dominance, she said. The first complaint was filed just three days after Executive Order 45, which designated the DoJ as the Competition Authority, took effect.

Article continues after this advertisement

De Lima noted that the DoJ faced a number of challenges in performing its mandate: Lack of capacity in terms of the absence of in-depth industry studies mapping out the state of competition and the extent of regulatory capture in the country, entrenched systems and vested interests, and the absence of strong consumer lobby groups.

As the country’s Competition Authority, she explained that the DoJ was mandated to investigate all cases involving possible violations of competition laws, enforce competition policies and consumer protection laws, and supervise market competition.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The mandate is broad and is not limited to the criminal prosecution of offenders. It includes ways and means to solve constraints. But if there are bad eggs … we will not hesitate to use our … prosecutorial powers,” De Lima said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: competition law, Department of Justice, Philippines

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.