RCBC: Why blame us for $81-M heist? | Inquirer Business

RCBC: Why blame us for $81-M heist?

New wave of senior management changes set as key bank officials resign

rcbc-0315

Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation (RCBC) INQUIRER FILE PHOTO/RAFFY LERMA

Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. (RCBC) Tuesday shifted the blame for the $81-million money laundering scandal to the party from whom the funds were stolen—Bangladesh Bank (BB)— saying it was the negligence of the impoverished South Asian country’s central bank that was the immediate cause of the crime.

In a statement, the external counsel of the Yuchengco-controlled universal bank stressed that it was not liable to pay BB for the theft of its funds deposited at the New York Federal Reserve Bank.

Article continues after this advertisement

“RCBC is not the proximate cause of the theft. They have no case against us,” RCBC external counsel Thea Daep said. “BB was the one who was negligent. We therefore urge BB to be transparent to the Philippine government, which has done so much to help them and show us who really stole from them.”

FEATURED STORIES

The statement of Daep came after Bangladesh’s ambassador to Manila John Gomes said his country was seeking compensation from RCBC of up to $50 million, or about P2.5 billion, as committed by the bank’s former president, Lorenzo Tan, during a Senate probe on the controversy last April.

As this developed, Yuchengco-led RCBC is undergoing a new wave of senior management revamp following the resignation of some key officials.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lawyer Ma. Celia Fernandez-Estavillo, long-time corporate secretary, director and head of the legal and regulatory affairs group, tendered her resignation effective Nov. 29, RCBC disclosed to the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) Tuesday.

Article continues after this advertisement

She was one of the key resource persons who explained RCBC’s side during the Senate hearings on the $81-million Bangladesh cyberheist earlier this year.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I signified my intention to resign after all matters pending in the Senate and the BSP (Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas) had been resolved. At this stage in my life, I would like to move on and pursue other endeavors. It has nothing to do with the case recently filed against some of the RCBC officers. Rather, it has everything to do with what the future holds for me,” Estavillo said in a text message Tuesday when asked about the resignation.

RCBC has hired another UP Law graduate, George Gilbert dela Cuesta, to take over the post to be vacated by Estavillo. He will head the bank’s legal and regulatory affairs group with the rank of first senior vice president effective Jan. 1, 2017.

Article continues after this advertisement

Expatriate senior vice president Koji Ozonawa also quit his post effective today. He was the Japanese liaison officer of RCBC’s Japanese business relationship office. He was formerly the senior manager of the international credit administration department of Sanwa Bank Ltd. in Tokyo in 1999.

Lizette Margaret Mary Racela, RCBC’s first SVP and group head of retail banking, has also quit her post effective today. To take over Racela’s post, the bank has hired Jonathan Diokno as the new head of retail banking group with the rank of first SVP effective Jan. 16, 2017.

To date, Bangladesh has only been able to recover $15 million of the total amount stolen by hackers who sent the funds to Philippine casino operator Solaire through RCBC. Casino junket operator Kim Wong surrendered the funds that were brought in by his Chinese clients upon learning that these were the proceeds of a crime.

Daep squarely blamed Bangladesh, pointing out that “numerous reports quoting high Bangladeshi officials and the initial findings of BB’s own investigation indicated that the heist got help from BB insiders. Shortly after, BB decided to abort its investigation, which raises a lot of questions, to say the least.”

She claimed that RCBC was just the recipient of the funds that went through “three layers of highly protected financial institutions”: The New York Federal Reserve, the Swift international money transfer service and the three global banks that eventually made the remittance.

Daep accused Gomes of “unfairly using media to pressure the Philippine government and make it its own collection agent and in the process is creating an undue and unnecessary adverse public portrayal of RCBC and, by extension, the local banking sector.”

“Ambassador Gomes has blamed everybody but itself for its loss,” she said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The bank’s lawyer challenged the Bangladeshi central bank to produce the results of its own investigations to help shed light on who the perpetrators were since, she said, these “will be critical in helping the global banking sector protect itself.”

TAGS: Business, economy, money laundering, News, RCBC

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.