SC asked to stop P70-B LRT Cavite extension project | Inquirer Business

SC asked to stop P70-B LRT Cavite extension project

/ 02:24 PM February 20, 2015

Light Rail Transit (LRT) Line 1. FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—A petition has been filed with the Supreme Court to stop the implementation of the P70-billion Light Rail Transit’s (LRT) Cavite extension project.

The Cavite extension project is the 32-year concession agreement executed between the Department of Transportation and Communication (DOTC) and the Light Rail Transit Authority (LRTA) and private concessionaire Light Rail Manila Corporation (LRMC).


Under the agreement, the LRMC will construct the planned extension of rail services to Cavite in exchange for, among others, the takeover of the existing LRT1 facilities, including the right to its daily income of around P7-million per day for the next 32 years, at the very least.

The Cavite extension project spans 11.71 kilometers and would cost almost P70-billion, P39 billion of which will be for civil and electrical works.


In his 21-page petition, Atty. Salvador B. Belaro Jr. said the Cavite extension project is “the most disadvantageous government contract of all time.”

He said the project is overpriced by at least 300 percent than its actual cost compared to the North extension project. The North extension project is 5.71 kilometers from Monumento to North Edsa and cost only P6.3-billion.

Belaro explained that with the signing of the concession agreement, the concessionaire already earned almost P18-billion representing the allegedly overpriced amount of the construction project.

Because of the P18-billion income, he said the concessionaire did not suffer the burden of paying a 10-percent downpayment for the project worth P935,010.390.

Upon the signing of the concession agreement, the concessionaire has also started enjoying the income of Line 1 worth P2.53 billion a year.

“In effect, there is basis in saying that in the final analysis, the concessionaire did not pay anything for this project while on the other hand, the government, pursuant to the financial package under the concession agreement stands to derive no income, for the entire duration of the concession period of 32 years, extendible to 50 years,” Belaro said.

Belaro added that the DOTC abused its authority when it conducted the bidding for the project.


DOTC, the petitioner said is guilty of usurpation of the powers and functions of the LRTA.

“LRTA’s act of empowering DOTC to act in its behalf with respect to the bidding of its rail projects is an invalid sub-delegation of legislative power,” Belaro said adding that the process violated Republic Act 6957 or the Build-Operate-Transfer Law (BOT Law).

The petitioner added that the concession agreement requires Congressional approval being a franchise holder of a public utility as required under the Constitution.

He added that the parties to the concession agreement also violated the public ’s right to information due to lack of public disclosure on the bidding and post-bidding period of the project.

“In the light of said constitutional provisions, one wonders why no public hearings were held to consult the people regarding the Cavite extension project…Also, while bidding was initially conducted, which allegedly resulted [in] a failure, the circumstances leading to the negotiation with the concessionaire were not fully disclosed to the public, which is alarming for a contract of such magnitude,” Belaro added.


P65B LRT-1 Cavite PPP deal awarded to Manny V. Pangilinan-backed group

LRT-1 Cavite extension to be completed in Q1 of 2019

Subscribe to our business newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Cavite extension project, light rail transit, LRT, LRTA, overpriced deal, Salvador Belaro Jr., supreme court, transportation
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our business news

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2021 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.