CA nullifies RTC order on estate case | Inquirer Business

CA nullifies RTC order on estate case

/ 12:05 AM July 15, 2014

The Court of Appeals has nullified an order issued by a Quezon City Regional Trial Court (RTC) judge, whom the CA said committed grave abuse of discretion, which favored one of the heirs in an inheritance case dispute.

In a decision promulgated last June 30, the CA’s Ninth Division said RTC Judge Alexander S. Balut “acted with grave abuse of discretion or in excess of his jurisdiction” when he issued a writ of execution favoring Jose T. Marcelo Jr., a heir of the Jose Marcelo Sr. estate case being heard in Balut’s Branch 76 of the QC RTC.

CA Justices Fernanda Lampas Peralta, Myra V. Garcia-Fernandez and Francisco P. Acosta upheld a petition filed by Anna Melinda Marcelo-Revilla and John Steven J. Marcelo, children of Edward T. Marcelo, the elder brother of Jose Marcelo Jr.

Article continues after this advertisement

The heirs of Edward Marcelo sought relief from the CA after Judge Balut in Sept. 20 last year issued a writ of execution to compel Anna and John Marcelo to submit shares of stock certificates and real estate titles on a list of assets that Jose Marcelo Jr. claimed is part of the estate of his father Jose Marcelo Sr.

FEATURED STORIES

The writ of execution in favor of Jose Marcelo Jr. was to enforce Balut’s order last June 28, 2010, that approved his petition for the surrender to him of stock certificates and land titles, in his capacity as administrator of Jose Marcelo Sr.’s estate.

However, the CA said Judge Balut failed to comply with his own 2010 order for hearings to be conducted to check if the assets being claimed by Jose Marcelo Jr. were indeed part of Jose Marcelo Sr.’s estate. The CA also noted that the disputed assets were not in the name of the Jose Marcelo Sr.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Business, Court of Appeals, writ of execution

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.