Pfizer ups offer for AstraZeneca again, to $119B

By: 10 years ago

British police officers gather outside Portcullis House after the arrival of Pfizer CEO Ian Read for a committee hearing in London, Tuesday, May 13, 2014. British lawmakers are expected to pressure the chief executive of Pfizer to guarantee jobs should the American company succeed in taking over London-based AstraZeneca, when they question him on Tuesday. Ian Read faces Parliament’s Business Innovation and Skills Committee to defend his company’s $106 billion cash and stock offer. The U.S. drugmaker has sought in writing to ease worries that British jobs will be lost — but has so far failed to convince skeptical lawmakers. AP

NEW YORK—U.S. drugmaker Pfizer said it has raised its offer for British rival AstraZeneca by 15 percent over its last bid, making the stock-and-cash offer worth $118.8 billion.

If the deal comes off, it would be the richest acquisition ever among drugmakers and the third-biggest deal in any industry, according to figures from research firm Dealogic.

Pfizer Inc., the world’s second-biggest drugmaker by revenue, has been courting No. 8 AstraZeneca PLC since January, saying their businesses are complementary and would be stronger together.

Pfizer’s offer Sunday comes amid a surge of other deals as drugmakers look to grow or eliminate noncore assets to focus on their strengths.

This is the third time Pfizer has sweetened its offer, this time by 15 percent over its last bid, but it’s the New York company’s first formal proposal. Pfizer says it “cannot be increased” unless AstraZeneca engages it in discussions before a deadline on May 26 and recommends a deal.

Pfizer also increased the ratio of cash AstraZeneca shareholders would receive, from 33 percent to 45 percent.

Pfizer said in a statement it won’t make a hostile offer directly to AstraZeneca’s stockholders and will only proceed if the company’s board recommends accepting the deal.

Pfizer CEO Ian Read said in a statement that the “combination is in the best interests of all stakeholders. We are excited at the opportunity to create a scientific powerhouse, delivering great benefits to patients and science in the UK and across the globe.”

Read noted that after speaking with AstraZeneca officials earlier Sunday, he didn’t think its board was “prepared to recommend a deal at a reasonable price.” Pfizer said it hopes AstraZeneca’s shareholders will push for the deal.

AstraZeneca has repeatedly rejected Pfizer’s offers, insisting they significantly undervalue the company and its portfolio of experimental drugs. The company and British government officials also have raised concerns about the prospect of job cuts, facility closures and losing some of the science leadership in the UK, where London-based AstraZeneca is the second-biggest drugmaker, behind GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Pfizer has made assurances such cuts would be limited. It’s promised to complete AstraZeneca’s research and development hub in Cambridge. And it pledged to establish the new company’s tax residence, but not headquarters, in England, which would significantly reduce its future tax rate.

But layoffs are inevitable in big mergers, and Pfizer has a track record of eliminating tens of thousands of jobs around the world as a result of megadeals.

While Pfizer is best known to the public for Viagra, cholesterol fighter Lipitor and other widely used medicines, in the pharmaceutical industry it’s known for two other things: marketing muscle and mega mergers, which together have repeatedly propelled it to the top.

Since 2000, it’s done three acquisitions that have vaulted the company to No. 1 in revenue. It paid $111.8 billion for Warner-Lambert Co. in 2000 to get the rights to Lipitor, then $59.8 billion for Pharmacia Corp. in 2003 and $68 billion for Wyeth in 2009, according to Dealogic.

With this deal, Pfizer would then be the buyer in four of the 10 richest deals ever in the pharmaceutical industry.

Each of those deals resulted in massive layoffs and closures of some medicine factories, research facilities and office buildings, with the cost-cutting boosting Pfizer’s bottom line for a few years. That’s clearly a key part of the rationale for this proposal, along with the prospect of lower taxes and getting some promising experimental drugs from AstraZeneca’s labs.

Pfizer also wants to add to its medicine portfolio to boost revenue. The company slipped from No. 1 to No. 2 last year, behind Novartis AG, mainly because Lipitor got generic competition at the end of 2011, wiping out several billion dollars in annual sales. Pfizer also has sold off a couple parts of its business and reorganized as part of preparations to possibly break off another part of the company, something analysts have been urging it to do.