Ongpin, coaccused seek junking of raps | Inquirer Business

Ongpin, coaccused seek junking of raps

/ 04:42 AM October 22, 2013

Businessman Roberto Ongpin: Motion to quash. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The accused in the two graft cases connected to the alleged P660-million behest loan granted to Deltaventures Resources Inc. (DVRI), a company beneficially owned by businessman Roberto Ongpin, on Monday asked the Sandiganbayan to immediately resolve their motion to dismiss the cases filed against them by the Ombudsman ahead of their scheduled arraignment on Nov. 14.

In their urgent joint motion before the antigraft court’s Third Division, Ongpin and former Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) chair Patricia Sto. Tomas, along with their 17 coaccused, prayed for an early resolution to quash the information, which has been pending for nearly two months.

Article continues after this advertisement

DVRI used the loan to acquire Philex Mining Corp. shares owned by DBP and then sold these to businessman Manuel V. Pangilinan months later, allowing the latter to gain control of the country’s biggest gold producer.

FEATURED STORIES

Ongpin and other accused individuals adopted the motion to quash dated Aug. 28 filed by former DBP officials and directors.

In their motion, the accused said there was lack of probable cause to indict them, as they were just collateral damage in what they described as “politically spiced legal intricacies.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Through their counsel, the accused DBP officers and members of credit committees or members of its board of directors denied conspiring with one another to release the loan to DVRI as they were just performing their ministerial functions when they recommended its approval.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Outside of conspiracy, or without conspiracy, the accused could in no way be connected to the criminal charges therein,” said their defense lawyer.

Article continues after this advertisement

“And since there is no conspiracy, how can probable cause exist against the accused?” the counsel asked.

The accused likewise pointed to the absence of a violation of banking laws and rules of the Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas.—Cynthia D. Balana

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: behest loan, Roberto Ongpin, Sandiganbayan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.