Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
Wed, Feb 10, 2010 05:08 AM Philippines      25°C to 33°C
  HOME       NEWS     SPORTS     SHOWBIZ AND STYLE      TECHNOLOGY     BUSINESS     OPINION      GLOBAL NATION    SERVICES
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Xoom

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Money / Top Stories Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Business > Money > Top Stories

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  




imns


Unilab gears for battle vs. Pfizer

By Abigail L. Ho
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 03:16:00 10/20/2009

Filed Under: Pharmaceuticals

UNITED LABORATORIES INC., the country’s biggest local pharmaceutical firm, is bent on dismantling the monopoly of industry giant Pfizer Inc. over the widely popular anti-hypertensive Atorvastatin, marketed under the Lipitor brand.

Unilab launched earlier this month its version of the drug, branded Avamax, which sold for about 30-percent cheaper than Lipitor.

According to market data, Pfizer’s Lipitor currently sells for P34.45 for a 10-milligram (mg) tablet, P39.13 for a 20-mg tablet, and P50.50 for a 40-mg tablet.

Prior to the imposition of the Maximum Drug Retail Price under RA 9502, or the Universally Accessible and Quality Cheaper Medicines Act, Lipitor was priced at P63.75, P78.25 and P101 for a 10-mg, 20-mg, and 40-mg tablet, respectively.

Unilab’s Avamax, on the other hand, goes for P25 for a 10-mg, P30 for a 20-mg, and P35 for a 40-mg tablet.

The two pharmaceutical companies are now locked in a patent battle, with Unilab challenging Pfizer’s patent for Atorvastatin through a filing with the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines seeking to cancel this particular patent.

The Atorvastatin patent was actually held by Warner Lambert, which Pfizer acquired in 2004.

According to sources, Unilab’s petition for patent cancellation was based on the patent’s failure to meet patentability standards under the Intellectual Property Code and the Cheaper Medicines Act.

If anything, the patent was an attempt at “evergreening,” or making small modifications on the same compound to ensure almost perpetual patent renewal.

Similar patents, however, have already been invalidated in Austria, Australia, Germany, Norway, South Korea, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom, paving the way for the introduction of lower-priced generic versions of the drug.

The Unilab petition is still pending action of IP Philippines.



Copyright 2010 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:



  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2010 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
BizLinq
Jobmarket Online
INQ GAMES
Focalcast