SLEx operator opposes DPWH Daang Hari policy

Revisions in toll road design seen affecting expressway expansion


South Luzon Tollway Corp. (SLTC) has formally objected to the decision of the Department of Public Works and Highways to allow last-minute changes in the design of the Daang Hari road project without securing the approval of all involved parties.

In a letter to Public Works Secretary Rogelio Singson, the operator of the South Luzon Expressway said it had agreed to the original design of the 4-kilometer tollroad, but was surprised to find out that recent revisions proposed by the winning bidder—Ayala Corp.—was given more weight by the department over SLTC’s guaranteed right to widen SLEx.

SLTC said it was “surprised” that the department had adopted the technical justifications of the Daang Hari winning bidder, which did not accept the original roundabout design of the DPWH.

“We are at a loss as to why the DPWH is now asserting that the DPWH rotunda design ‘does not meet the minimum performance standards and specifications’ for the Daang Hari Road project,” SLTC said in its letter to Singson.

The Daang Hari connector road is the first project awarded under the Aquino administration’s Public-Private Partnership (PPP) program. It is meant to help decongest vehicular traffic in southern Metro Manila by connecting the parallel SLEx and Daang Hari roadways. The right to build and operate it was won by Ayala Corp. with a bid of P902 million in December 2011, but work has not commenced on the project due to disagreements over the road’s design.

In SLTC’s letter to Singson, the company said the old rotunda design was the very same one used by the DPWH when the project was bid out last year.

“We assume that in asking the potential investors to bid based on the rotunda design, the DPWH had represented that the design met the minimum performance standards and specifications that the DPWH had set for the said project,” SLTC said.

SLTC pointed out that its own Supplemental Toll Concession Agreement entered into with the government when it rebuilt SLEx a decade ago guaranteed it the right to expand the toll road by adding more lanes.

DPWH’s unilateral decision to accept Ayala’s redesign will prevent it from expanding SLEx, which at present, is already nearing maximum capacity due to the growth in vehicular traffic, SLTC said.

SLTC issued a “no objection” letter to this design, but later withdrew it when it learned that DPWH approved a revised Ayala plan which would prevent SLTC from expanding SLEx by adding lanes to accommodate growing vehicular traffic.

The company reiterated that the design changes were “effected without consulting with SLTC, or obtaining its consent thereto, in complete disregard of the latter’s 23 September 2011 ‘no objection’ conditions.”

Under the proposed changes, DPWH will have to underwrite as much as P500 million for the so-called “variation order” after it accepted the design materially different from the original roundabout design.

SLTC reminded the DPWH that the company had acquired a 60-meter right-of-way space, as required by the department, precisely to allow for future expansion of the road. The new design will affect the right of way.

“It is therefore unwise, from an engineering, economic and political standpoint, to limit the right of way of SLEx and thus remove or prevent the possibility of widening SLEx, particularly the section between Filinvest and Susana Heights, which is currently used by more than 150,000 passenger cars daily, only to benefit a much smaller number of vehicles that will use the Daang Hari Road,” SLTC argued.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Melvin Prieto

    Bakit hindi naisip ng mga genius sa DOF at PPP na nagsulat ng contract na ok ang design change pero ang dapat sumalo ng variation ay ang gustong magpalit ng design, and not US, THE TAXPAYERS! MATATALINO naman sila, pero ito pa ang nakaligtaan nila – BOBO!

  • Arrow Bay

    The design made was for a three-level connection; one- the at-grade connection from SLEx to DaangHari (southbound) and DangHari to SLEx (West south bound), second level- from SLEx to DaangHari (Northwest bound) and third-the DaangHari to SLEx (Westnorth bound). All the lanes along SLEx shall have enough room for widening in the future and the right-of-way of ramps linking DaangHari in SLEx near SUzana I/C or ChowKing area shall be acquired by the link road proponent. A rotunda at that connection is madness. But if they are talking of a rotunda in DaangHari area near Pontecille subdivision, it may work in the beginning when traffic is still low. It will never work when traffic is high and a lot of congestion will not served the purpose.

  • Jack

    napakalakas talaga ang mga ayala kay pnoy, they are getting all gov’t projects they want 

  • Jack

    in short, this project will be implemented by 2022 when all the parties involved agree to their controllable greed

  • Night


  • WeAry_Bat

    “only to benefit a much smaller number of vehicles that will use the Daang Hari Road”

    When it is built, the southwest traffic will come.  A question is, why was there a redesign?  Is there a big boulder around, or there is some thought putting a mall around the area?

    • Dibo Dragon

      nakalimutan ilagay ng DPWH ang kick-back nila sa original design…

      • WeAry_Bat

         “DPWH will have to underwrite as much as P500 million”

        kung ganun, mey pera pala sa paglagay ng imburnal at pagiging tanga.   teka, hindi sila tanga kung ganun  ha ha ha 

        50% sa winning bid, talo pa nila interest rate ng mga bangko ha ha ha

        kelan kaya papasok ang COA at Ombudsman dito para mag-footbol sila hahaha

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos