Quantcast
Latest Stories

MAPping the Future

Revised tobacco taxes: Bane or blessing?

By

(First of a series)

Asthma is no walk in the park. I’ve been having some very annoying asthma attacks over the past few months—no thanks to the ridiculously erratic weather and the countless smoke-befogged boardrooms and offices I’ve had to endure lately. And the doctor gave me a choice between the beach or my room. Since I dread the thought of fighting the traffic and enduring a long drive to a decent beach where I can have some peace and quiet, I’ve elected to stay home, crank up the air conditioner in my room, read old pocketbooks and watch some DVDs. There is something to be said for peaceful rooms free of noise, stress and, yes, cigarette smoke, the bane of every asthmatic’s existence.

All this talk about cigarette smoke, however, makes me think of the impending changes to the excise tax law on alcohol and tobacco products. Any time Congress makes changes to our tax laws, I get a little anxious, because I’m concerned about how those changes are going to influence everyday life—and I say this from the standpoint both of a tax practitioner and a Filipino citizen. Now, because the Pinoy likes to enjoy his beer and cigarettes, it’s not surprising that people are concerned about how the new excise tax provisions will affect the prices of a cold bottle of beer and a cigarette.

Experience tells us, though, that every change to the country’s tax laws has the potential to be a double-edged sword, and the only question is, which side of the sword will cut through Juan de la Cruz’s daily life? In the case of the excise tax on cigarettes, this is definitely a double-edged sword that will make Toledo sword makers sit up and take notice. So, let’s take a gander at each side of the blade, shall we?

I try to be a positive thinker, so let’s consider the advantages of raising the excise taxes on tobacco products. There are some very real benefits that may come about, and the first is that smokers just may cut down on their consumption of cigarettes. Higher taxes mean that it’ll cost more to light up, and less cigarettes sold will mean cleaner air for everyone. That just might translate into fewer days when my friends will come upon me wheezing like a car that badly needs a tuneup.

Still others will say that higher cigarette prices might discourage young people from acquiring the habit—it’s becoming a common sight to see teenagers smoking a stick or two outside school buildings, between their classes. Smoking, it seems, is “cool,” and it’s a rather disturbing truth that smokers are becoming younger and younger these days, raising the specter of an entire generation or two of Filipinos with crippling respiratory diseases.

As a father myself, I’m just glad my two children wouldn’t even come within a mile of a cigarette. Sadly, other parents aren’t as lucky as I am, and I’m sure that they’d welcome a rather sharp rise in cigarette prices in the hope that their children will be put off from spending so much on a stick of rolled-up leaves!

Now, the tax practitioner in me can understand why the government wants to raise the excise tax rates on tobacco and alcohol products, because it’s a fact that for many years now, cigarette companies haven’t had to address higher taxes. This is, either way you look at it, unfair to other industries that have seen higher tax rates over the passage of time, and it’s easy to see why the government has been working to remedy this situation.

Economic development is always best achieved when there’s a level playing field for all industries, and when every sector bears—as much as possible—an equal share of the responsibility to support national development.

Some cynics would say that the government is raising excise tax rates not so much to level the playing field, but to raise revenues from a particularly lucrative industrial sector—after all, millions of Pinoys can be seen puffing away in all kinds of places, from the street corner to the corner office.

But then, one can’t argue with the need to raise taxes which, as we all know, are absolutely necessary if we’re going to uphold such things as peace and order, health care, and so on.

Either way you look at it, you can’t run a government on a shoestring budget, or expect national development to come cheap. Everyone—the smokers included—has to pay his fair share of taxes, and invest in the future of the country.

I’m especially gratified by reports that there are plans to allocate excise tax revenues to healthcare programs, a particular sector of governance that I personally think needs to be funded as generously as possible.

All of these considerations are excellent reasons for an increase in the excise taxes on cigarettes. But like I said, raising tax rates can be a double-edged sword. And in the case of the excise tax on cigarettes, here’s the catch—if things go according to plan, the new excise tax rates will raise the taxes on tobacco products so dramatically that the price of cigarettes will surely hit stratospheric levels. And the cigarettes I’m referring to are not those fancy imported cigarettes, but the cigarettes that are locally produced by cigarette manufacturers who employ local labor and make use of local resources.

It doesn’t take a Stephen Hawking to realize that if the price of local cigarettes goes up faster than Iron Man at full throttle, there is bound to be an impact on the economy, and it will definitely not be a good one. The first casualty will be the tobacco industry itself—astronomical retail prices of locally manufactured cigarettes, which are by far the most popular and the most saleable cigarettes, may well mean not only a reduction, but a nose-dive in the sales of these cigarettes. And if that happens, then the government’s objective to raise revenues from the higher excise taxes will ultimately be defeated.

(To be concluded)

(The article reflects the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect the official stand of the Management Association of the Philippines. The author is a senior partner of The Tax Offices of Romero, Aguilar & Associates and member of the MAP national issues committee and the MAP tax committee. Feedback at map@globelines.com.ph. For previous articles, visit <map.org.ph>.)


Follow Us


Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://business.inquirer.net/?p=85952

Tags: cigarettes , Government , Philippines , sin tax , state budget and taxes , tobacco taxes



Copyright © 2013, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • 2 suspected robbers killed in shootout with QC police
  • Ex-Marine colonel’s murder linked to role in partylist group
  • 2 wounded as village defenders battle cattle rustlers in North Cotabato
  • Pope visits his first parish on Rome outskirts
  • Iran fields ‘massive’ number of missile launchers
  • Sports

  • NU beats Ateneo to forge deciding game for V-League plum
  • V-League: Pride drives Tigresses to take third place
  • Cain stops Bigfoot in 1st round, defends UFC title
  • Spurs take 3-0 lead, beat Grizzlies 104-93 in OT
  • Gay soccer player Robbie Rogers joins LA Galaxy
  • Lifestyle

  • Fragments of biblical treasure are up for sale
  • What’s cookin’ with AHA: Peppermint and Mango Iced Tea
  • A life well lived
  • Kevin Tan takes a bride
  • In Tokyo, Bulgari dazzlers amid the sakura blooms
  • Entertainment

  • NYPD investigating actress Bynes allegations
  • Cambodian film tops Un Certain Regard
  • Cannes: ‘The Immigrant’ stirs emotional response
  • Julie Delpy on life at 40
  • It takes two to do the show biz breakup cha-cha
  • Business

  • New York group cites PH progress in mining management, legislation
  • China premier warns EU over solar, telecom probes
  • Storm brews over control of US newspaper group
  • Coco sugar sweetens small town’s finances
  • Along Mt. Bulusan’s foothills: A balmy ‘agricultural resort’
  • Technology

  • A new way for Filipinos to connect on social media launched
  • Statement of Smart Communications
  • Yahoo takes big leap with $1.1B deal for Tumblr
  • Poll: More US teens turn to Twitter; Facebook old
  • Tips to avoid becoming an identity theft victim
  • Opinion

  • Deep impact
  • The return of traditional politics in Pampanga
  • Most important investment incentive
  • Making (and keeping) friends
  • The Trinity and us
  • Global Nation

  • Three Chinese ships in disputed waters – Japan
  • Before Dan Brown’s ‘gates of hell,’ the lustful Filipino rooster
  • Sky lanterns light up Iloilo sky, set world record
  • Filipino WWII veterans used to cover up for senators’ inaction on family unification
  • Warship from US here next month
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved
    skinner left
    skinner right