PAL seals Airbus refleeting deal

Local carrier to acquire up to 85 planes

A+
A
A-

REFLEETING DEAL SIGNING. PAL and Airbus officials pose after the signing ceremony at Century Park Hotel, from left, PAL vice chairman and treasurer Harry C. Tan, PAL Chairman Dr. Lucio C. Tan, Airbus Senior VP for Asia Jean Francois Laval and PAL President Ramon S. Ang.

MANILA, Philippines–Philippine Air­lines has sealed a deal for as many as 85 wide- and nar­row-bod­ied jet­lin­ers from the world’s big­gest air­craft man­u­fac­turer Air­bus In­dus­trie in a trans­ac­tion that the flag car­rier is set to an­nounce Tuesday.
Ac­cord­ing to in­dus­try sources fa­mil­iar with the mat­ter, the first phase of the mul­ti­year ac­qui­si­tion spree would see PAL ac­quir­ing up to 54 air­craft (raised from an initial order of 35) from the Euro­pean plane maker to boost its cur­rent fleet of 39 jets.

A report by Reuters released Tuesday pegs the total value of the deal’s first batch at $7 billion at the plane manufacturer’s list prices, although discounts for large orders are customary in the industry.

The new batch of air­craft is re­ported to in­clude up to 10 A330-300 twin-aisle jets, which will be de­ployed to PAL’s re­gional and mid-range flights, in­clud­ing its ex­pected re­turn to the Mid­dle East mar­ket.

PAL BUYS AIRBUS JETS. Philippine Airlines has inked with Airbus the biggest aircraft deal in Philippine history involving a firm order for more than 50 single-aisle and wide-body jets which are shown in this photo, with a list price of approximately US$7 billion. CONTRIBUTED PHOTO

The rest of the or­der will come in the form of sin­gle-aisle A320 jets and their higher-ca­pac­ity vari­ant, the A321, which will be used for re­gional and short-haul do­mes­tic flights.

The source added that or­ders for A320 and A321 air­craft would be in the form of Air­bus’ “neo” or New Engine Op­tion planes, which could pro­vide op­er­a­tors with as much as 20-per­cent cost sav­ings in terms of fuel con­sump­tion.

PAL se­lected the Air­bus A320­neo and A321­neo, in par­tic­u­lar, be­cause of its ef­forts to re­duce op­er­at­ing costs, es­pe­cially since fuel ac­counts for as much as 45 per­cent of the flag car­rier’s ex­penses.

The PAL-Air­bus deal was sup­posed to be an­nounced as early as last month dur­ing the bi­en­nial Farn­bor­ough Air­show in the United King­dom, but was de­layed due to last minute ne­go­ti­a­tions, ac­cord­ing to peo­ple fa­mil­iar with the deal.

Ear­lier, PAL pres­i­dent and San Miguel group head Ra­mon S. Ang said the air­line would ac­quire as many as 100 air­craft over the next few years as part of its re­fleet­ing ef­forts.

The bal­ance of the 100-plane ac­qui­si­tion plan is ex­pected to go to Air­bus’ ri­val, Boe­ing, in an­tic­i­pa­tion of the coun­try be­ing re­stored to Cat­e­gory 1 sta­tus by the US Fed­eral Avi­a­tion
Ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Un­der the Philip­pines’ cur­rent Cat­e­gory 2 sta­tus, PAL is pro­hib­ited from us­ing planes other than its cur­rent and ag­ing Boe­ing 747-400s and Air­bus A340-300s for flights to the US West Coast. The flag car­rier is also pro­hib­ited from mount­ing ad­di­tional flights to US des­ti­na­tions de­spite the grow­ing de­mand from di­rect trans-Pa­cific flights be­tween the two coun­tries.

PAL op­er­ates eight air­craft man­u­fac­tured by Boe­ing, namely three B777-300ERs and five 747-400s. It has 31 Air­bus jets in its fleet, made up of four A340-300s, eight A330300s, 15 A320-200s, and four A319s.

PAL re­cently placed an or­der for three more B777-300ERs, which can match the range of the B747, but has more ef­fi­cient fuel con­sump­tion since the for­mer model only has two en­gines com­pared to the lat­ter’s four.

Last week, PAL’s par­ent firm, PAL Hold­ings, re­ported that it had posted a com­pre­hen­sive net in­come of P489.2 mil­lion, mark­ing a sig­nif­i­cant turn­around from the P475.1-mil­lion loss in the same three-month pe­riod last year. To­tal rev­enues for the first quar­ter of the cur­rent fis­cal year amounted to P20.8 bil­lion or 5.8 per­cent higher than last year’s P19.6 bil­lion.

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Guest

    Airlines’ fleets roughly consist of 50% boeing and 50% airbus in order to have a balance.

  • http://joboni96.myopenid.com/ joboni96

    how the intsiks
    cream the pilipino economy
    with bureaucrat connivance

    reclaim the pilipino economy
    for pilipinos

  • GiantSlayer

     Considering that the majority of Overseas Filipinos are in the U.S. it
    would have been to PAL’s advantage to buy Boeing.  Not only does it
    employ a lot of Fil-Ams but it’s a case of scratching each other’s
    back.  Refleeting should have taken into consideration the DC-10 fiasco
    when PAL stuck with the aircraft but in the end had to buy Boeing 747s. 
    On a minor scale the purchase of
    the A340 instead of more 747s was bad
    as the A340 are not suited for its role unlike the Jumbos.

    A better alternative would have been:

    Latest model B737 instead of A270/271 for short haul

    The B787 Dreamliner instead of the A330 for intermediate & regional routes

    Boeing 747-800 instead of the A380. Look at photos of the two.  The
    747-800 looks better & in aviation, if it looks right, usually it is
    better.  And Boeing’s safety record is way above that of Airbus S.A.

    • maorag44

       I agree with your suggestion.  You must be referring ot the Boeing 737 MAX which my favorite airline when in the U.S. Southwest Airlines, ordered almost 80 units.  I recommend using this when you are there for domestic flights but book thru the internet as savings are significant & they have liberal baggage policies unlike others there who charges you for each check-in piece.  You also did not mention the ruggedness of Boeing aircraft.  The 747 Jumbos have survived numerous incidents which would have downed an Airbus, like flying thru the ashes of an erupting volcano & explosives detonations.  The recent A380 problem in Singapore which resulted in the grounding by Quantas of this aircraft further eroded my confidence in them.

      • aSwedishguy

         “”You also did not mention the ruggedness of Boeing aircraft.  The 747
        Jumbos have survived numerous incidents which would have downed an
        Airbus, like flying thru the ashes of an erupting volcano &
        explosives detonations”””

        Wowww,, Do you even know that Airbus or Boeing do not manufacture engines ??

        First of all the BA Flight 9 747 (ash Jakarta) was equipped with RR

        Second, both incidents you talking about (to highlight Boeing ) have nothing to do with Boeing or Airbus whatsoever when they are engine related and thats the buyers choice!!! 

      • maorag44

         I know that the engines are not made by the aircraft manufacturers.  Those are either Rolls-Royce, GE, & Pratt & Whitney comprising the top makers.  Still Boeing has ran-up an impressive safety record still unmatched by others.  There’s PAL B747 PR434 where Al Qaeda detonated a bomb inflight a passenger together with his seat fell off the hole made by the explosive, & who can forget Aloha Airlines B737 Flight 243 where the entire upper portion was blown-off?  Since the B-17 Flying Fortress, Boeing has had an unmatched record for structural strength..  Why is there no Airbus used as fire bombers, even the older models?  It requires a rugged aircraft to do it, that’s why.

      • aSwedishguy

         For sure i do not understand what´s your point!?

        Let me ask you something

        How many incidents with fatality’s  do you find with a A340 f. ex.?

        This Boeing vs Airbus Comparison are just ridicules

      • maorag44

         My point is that Boeing makes better airplanes. There’s too few A340 in use but offhand, I remember the Air France A330 flight from Brazil.  I do not slam Airbus, but Boeing has been here for a long time & though there are fatalities like KAL 747 getting shot down by the Soviets, collision on the runway, or the 767s that slammed iinto the WTC, there never was a question about the integrity of the airframes.  The wing cracks on the A380 is serious & has led to the cancellation of several orders.  It should have been found out during the tests. Airframe integrity sunk the British airline industry.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

editors' picks

advertisement

popular

advertisement

videos