State of the Nation’s traffic

Improvements on the way, according to Aquino

A+
A
A-

A man who obviously loves driving, President Benigno Aquino III frequently alludes to his programs using road-based metaphors: tuwid na daan and walang wang-wang being two memorable mottos of his administration. So we were straining to hear what he had to say during the State of the Nation address about the traffic situation in and around Metro Manila.

It has been hell on wheels for motorists and commuters within Metro Manila. July 4 saw a bus wedged into the Ortigas flyover, with the driver allegedly texting; four days later, fatalities at the Shaw underpass; and scores of other accidents happening during that week. It was enough to send the MetroManila Development Authority (MMDA) officials to seek divine intervention, as well as a slew of new regulations to
discipline bus drivers.

Then there’s the horrendous traffic, omnipresent from dawn to midnight nearly every day. We are where Bangkok was in the late 1990s, before trains and elevated highways helped to relieve the bumper-to-bumper scenery. The reasons for our misery:

• Not enough roads and bridges: There have been only a handful of major roads built within Metro Manila in the past 10 years. Most of these have been connectors, like the Mindanao Avenue entrance-exit to the North Luzon Expressway. These have relieved congestion and cut travel time, for sure, but the endpoints of these roads are still subject to traffic gridlocks.

• Poor quality of roads: Where there are roads, there are potholes. The Department of Public Works and Highways has sworn to build and repair using only high-quality materials and methods. However, recent repairs like those on C5, and screw-ups like the paving over of manhole covers show that there’s still a long way to go in that aspect.

• Insufficient roads and parking structures around major hubs like the airports and LRT stations

• Flooding: Sections of EDSA and SLEx are prone to flooding, slowing down traffic to a crawl or standstill.

• Discipline: It’s not uncommon to see illegally parked vehicles along major roads, such as in Barangay Libis, every single day, with the MMDA apparently powerless to remove these vehicles, despite outpost station being within sight.

• Buses: Provincial, city, half-full, empty: buses are there whether or not they’re needed.

It’s a very real problem not just to motorists, who live and unfortunately breathe here every day, but in terms of the millions of man-hours and tons of pollution pumped into the air as cars, buses and trucks idle in traffic. Tourists stay away from Manila because of the congestion; if we’re lucky, they’ll head to Cebu instead. Fortunately, there is some light at the end of the tunnel (like our dimly lit underpasses)—President Aquino outlined the projects that should help relieve the daily misery of Metro Manila traffic:

• Ninoy Aquino International Airport Expressway: a 7.15-kilometer, four-lane elevated expressway to link the Naia terminals and connect the SLEx Skyway with the Manila-Cavite Toll Road and Roxas Boulevard. This is expected to reduce travel time from Skyway to Naia Terminal 1 from around 24 minutes to 8.2 minutes. Construction will be from January 2014 to December 2015.

— NLEx-SLEx Link Connector Road: a 13.4-kilometer, four-lane elevated expressway to link NLEx and SLEx, using the Philippine National Railways route. Construction is targeted from January 2014 to December 2015.

— Metro Manila Skyway Stage 3: a 14.2-kilometer, six-lane elevated expressway, with eight interchanges and 15 toll plazas, to link NLEx and SLEx, and decongest EDSA. Construction is targeted from 2013 to mid-2015.

— Construction of provincial bus terminals at Trinoma, FTI and Coastal Road to eliminate 7,300 provincial buses currently traveling within Metro Manila. This is just in the feasibility study phase and is expected to be completed by 2016.

— As for provincial roads, the administration has promised to completely pave 31,242 kilometer of the national road network. Temporary bridges and damaged bridges will be replaced, and existing bridges will be widened—117,647 of them.

In other words, it’s going to get worse before it gets better. It is likely that these construction projects will bog down traffic while they are ongoing. But at least relief is being planned for, and is actually about to start. (Why previous governments could not, or did not, do any of this, is another subject altogether.)

We can imagine that in 2016, President Aquino himself will climb into a Porsche (or whatever he might fancy at that time), no longer to be criticized for his taste in cars, and zoom off on one of those spanking new highways. So shall we all, we hope.

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • DiegoManosca

    What was missing in the SONA and in this article is the
    reference to people as main beneficiaries of transportation infrastructure
    improvements. This means that infrastructure improvements have to be for all
    people traveling on the road, and for most people, this is by public
    transportation and not by private cars. Please note that up to 80% of all trips
    in Metro Manila are by public transport and only a few own and use private
    cars. Building more and more roads, especially elevated ones, are not the
    solution to the problem – these only serve as short-term solutions. For anyone
    who has been to Bangkok recently, clearly they have not addressed the traffic
    problem despite the number of elevated roads they’ve built.

    Now imagine if all goes well in our economy and car ownership and use doubles?
    We cannot build more and more roads just to accommodate all vehicles on the
    road. Space is finite, and cities need space for other uses not just roads,
    e.g. parks and other open spaces.

    What we need is a complete overhaul of the transportation system that
    prioritizes movement of people instead of private cars, i.e. more resources
    allocated for mass transportation like the heavy rail and the light-rail
    system, integrated and efficient bus system, and adequate facilities for
    walking especially roads and streets connecting to public transport, and of course,
    cycling facilities as well. In Singapore, this is what they prioritize and even
    tax private car owners more, by raising ownership costs of vehicles and as well
    as use through their electronic road pricing. Look at their transport system –
    it may not be perfect but it definitely serves the most number of the commuting
    public. People prefer public transport over cars because of its efficiency and
    connectedness. The rising number and use of motorcycles is also directly
    proportional to the deteriorating state of the public transport system, i.e.
    more numbers of low to middle class choose to brave Manila traffic by
    motorcycles to quickly reach their destinations.  

    In other parts of the world, from Copenhagen to New York, more efforts are
    being put in place to make cycling work in cities, especially for the shorter
    trips (1-3km). Imagine when oil prices double? We must prepare now and make
    sure that our transport system will not be held hostage by private companies
    (including oil and even car manufacturers) when oil and fare prices skyrockets.

    Now this was what I was hoping more to hear with respect to urban
    transportation improvements, not only for Metro Manila but especially for the
    smaller and emerging metropolitan areas in the country. I know it may be too
    idealistic and challenging, but then again when do we start to really address
    the underlying problems? Tama nga naman talaga ang mga katagang, “Kung hindi
    tayo, sino pa?” at “Kung hindi ngayon, kailan pa?”

  • Norberto del Mundo

    I think you forgot the tricycles, pedicabs padyak, motorcycles, motorcycles and more motorcycles on the road.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/U5LYFGEUD3JVH5Q7PLE7HRS5J4 ruel

    Yes, buses are in there whether or not they are needed.  In Commonwealth Avenue, buses are necessary especially every morning.  Why can’t they deploy more buses to Commonwealth? Maybe the LTFRB has to be flexible with franchise and route permissions in the interest of better services to commuters.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

editors' picks

advertisement
advertisement