Quantcast
Latest Stories

CA rules closure of Banco Filipino ‘illegal’

By:

Banco Filipino. AFP FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The Court of Appeals ordered the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) to reopen Banco Filipino and provide a P25-billion financial aid contained in the business plan previously approved by the BSP and the Monetary Board.

The appeals court in a 50-page decision gave the BSP 30 days to extend financial support to Banco Filipino based on the indicated business plan approved by the BSP and MB as it described the closure as “illegal.”

“The BSP and the Monetary Board are hereby ordered to reopen Banco Filipino Savings and Mortgage Bank and allow it to resume business in the Philippines under the comptrollership of the BSP and the MB, complete with a viable rehabilitation plan, in order to ensure fast and immediate recovery of the bank from the ill-defects of the illegal closure,” the appellate court said in ruling penned by Associate Justice Agnes Reyes-Carpio.

The BSP placed Banco Filipino under receivership on March 17 last year, three days after the thrift bank declared a bank holiday.

The BSP said the bank had to be closed because it was insolvent. The liabilities of Banco Filipino had exceeded its assets by P8.4 billion, the central bank said.

Banco Filipino in a petition before the Makati Regional Trial Court asked for a P25 billion worth of financial aid, saying it was entitled to the monetary assistance based on the 1991 Supreme Court decision which ordered the reopening and reorganization of Banco Filipino after its closure in 1985.

The Makati court, in its November 18, 2010 order, granted Banco Filipino’s application for a writ of preliminary mandatory and preventive injunction and directed BSP and MB to immediately implement the bank’s business plan.

But the Court of Appeals last year ruled that the injunction was issued with grave abuse of discretion and overturned the decision of the lower court.

This was reversed however with the appellate court telling the BSP to consider the current landscape since the business plan was drafted in 2009 for necessary “augmentations and adjustments.”

The appeals court also ordered that a special liquidity facility fund be put in place.

It said that while a P25-billion aid was approved by the BSP and MB, supervening events must be taken into consideration.

It cited as an example that when the Banco Filipino was about to close, it had around P16-billion deposit accounts which were reduced as the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation started  paying depositors and creditors.

“As soon as the reopening is published and announced, the depositors would flock and congregate in order to make the withdrawals. Thus, there is a need to address this matter before the reopening,” the appeals court said.

Aside from Carpio, the decision is concurred in by Associate Justice Vicente Veloso and Normandie Pizarro.

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Banco Filipino , Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas , Banking , Business , Court of Appeals , Finance , Judiciary , System if Justice

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
  • asdafaa qwesda

    !?!?!?!

    @&$# talaga ang philippine judiciary. Feeling nila mas may alam sila sa mga bankers at accountants kung paano magpatakbo ng bangko. Alam lang nila maghingi ng grease money and they can twist the law to redefine what is legal and illegal.

    And who are the losers? The filipino taxpayer who will foot banco filipino’s rehab funds. But why shoild the judiciary care? The judge and other court personnel can spend their bribesto buy whatever. Accountability to the public is something they spit on.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OHOD5EA75DBBUH53UKLRXRK764 Mang Teban

    Banco Filipino will have to prove its slogan, “Subok na matibay, subok na matatag” when it reopens after being closed down twice by the Central Bank.
    There is apparently something wrong with the Banco Filipino’s operations if it cannot make substantial strides to recover even with financial assistance. If we are to pinpoint responsibility, it is none other than the top executives at the helm of the bank.
    It becomes inevitable then to scrutinize who is running the bank. Perfecto Yasay does not seem to be that man. Sorry but that is how it is with banking operations. Depositors deserve to have bank officers who have the integrity to handle their deposits at the highest level of efficiency and liquidity to keep the financial condition of Banco Filipino “above water”.
    Another crash and that is it for this bank.

  • durock

    Sana yung CAP educational plan…. ganito rin para naman makabawi kami sa CAP na pinaghirapan din namin…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_433AYTAQRGRQD6CNXQKWD5ZZHY Sword

    Wow, this news is so informative.  The author has researched and provided a detailed and in-depth information on this issue.  Wow pare, ang galing… ~

  • Pablo Juan

    question:  since the PDIC had been paying the maximum of 500k per depositor, does a depositor still be able to withdraw their money once banco filipino opens? for example, if juan dela cruz had 1M in BF and was able to get the 500k PDIC check.. what happens to the 1M? will PDIC get the 500k it gave out to juan from BF and juan can still withdraw the remaining 500k?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_L36JQMLYXF4ZEYPMJO5LBHOXS4 David

      Good questions. If anything, it’s a matter of working out and verifying the details surrounding said depositor’s situation.

      Syempre a lawyer is best suited to answer, but I imagine Juan dela Cruz will only be able to withdraw his remaining P500K from BF if he’s confirmed to have already gotten his P500K PDIC check. Parang ganun if you get the drift.

      • Pablo Juan

        on the other hand, since the 500k is a payment for the loss due to a
        bank closing shop.. and the depositor has accepted the 500k then that
        can be construed as liabilities settled na as far as BF is concerned and therefore BF can keep the remaining 500k (actually the entire 1M since its PDIC who paid the 500k) ie juan de la cruz cant withdraw the 500k balance.

        IF that’s the case then BF will still have the depositors cash.. tama ba? I’m not so sure how this works, but if PDIC works like other insurance companies, then BF need not pay PDIC on the cash out since they would have been paying “premiums” before the bank holiday.

        Assuming this is the scenario, and the CA has instructed the BSP to “lend” billions again to BF for its 2nd (or 3rd na ata) coming then the only losers are the depositors and PDIC (or PDIC’s reinsurers to be exact). 

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_L36JQMLYXF4ZEYPMJO5LBHOXS4 David

        “on the other hand, since the 500k is a payment for the loss due to a 
        bank closing shop.. and the depositor has accepted the 500k then that 
        can be construed as liabilities settled na as far as BF is concerned and therefore BF can keep the remaining 500k (actually the entire 1M since its PDIC who paid the 500k) ie juan de la cruz cant withdraw the 500k balance.

        IF that’s the case then BF will still have the depositors cash.. tama ba? I’m not so sure how this works, but if PDIC works like other insurance companies, then BF need not pay PDIC on the cash out since they would have been paying “premiums” before the bank holiday.”

        May point ka dyan. If anything, BF will ensure they won’t lose/pay out to that depositor if ever s/he wants to claim the entire P1M from them, especially if BF can verify that depositor got his/her check na.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_X2KCFP4HSH2XJYTOH4FMP2CVDE Mac

        simple lang ang sagot dyan, yung hindi nabayaran ng PDIC babayaran pa ulit. kung 500K lang ang nakuha mo out of your 1M me bakanse pa na makukuha ang depositor.  Yung mga nabayaran below 500K wala na silang makukuha. Pinapagulo mo lang

  • Anonymous

    This is good news for those accounts which PDIC failed to “honor and pay”  due to “special deposits” classification or incomplete documentation even if you have your bank passbook.



Copyright 2011 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • P91-M Los Baños loan deal questioned
  • Cagayan workers to get P25 more in daily wages
  • 2 in Bacolod doctor’s slay tied to other killings
  • Fewer dengue cases reported in Central Mindanao
  • Philippine dairy trade seeks help to reduce imports
  • Sports

  • Fiery Lady Eagles stay on top, trip Lady Stags
  • Young Alcala topples 19-under champ Clarito
  • Big Chill ties Cebuana for 2nd
  • Loyola Meralco debuts in S-League
  • Dumaguete ready for Nat’l Games
  • Lifestyle

  • Dress your man
  • How to make your fragrance last
  • From barbershop to hair salon
  • Style is for all ages
  • Building a school up in the clouds
  • Entertainment

  • A passage to Tawi-Tawi
  • A film that took years to write in Cinemalaya
  • ‘Manoy’ for all seasons
  • Tony DeZuñiga, comic book legend
  • ‘Captive’ preem at Shang’s French fest
  • Business

  • ‘Hot money’ flow slows to a trickle
  • Asian markets mixed but Greek fears weigh
  • BoI makes pitch for 200 projects worth P60B
  • Philippines urged to implement REIT system
  • NEDA: PH dev’t, growth targets still feasible
  • Technology

  • As Facebook grows, millions say, ‘no, thanks’
  • Joey De Venecia sues NTC, telcos
  • Companies ask: Does advertising on Facebook pay?
  • Google strives to enlighten with new search tool
  • Zuckerberg’s Facebook story is study in contrasts
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, May 18, 2012
  • It’s not about you
  • Extraordinary gang-up
  • Living in a golden age
  • 15 years
  • Global Nation

  • It’s final: DFA to close 10 foreign posts
  • Aquino to visit US, London next month
  • Philippine-China tensions likely to have modest effects on economy
  • Albay gov renews call for boycott of China products
  • DFA to close 10 embassies, consulates
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2011 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved
    news