Quantcast
Latest Stories

Nuke plant conversion to coal feasible

Gov’t to evaluate cost, technology issues

By:

COAL CONVERSION The conversion of the mothballed Bataan nuclear power plant into a coal-fired facility is a feasible option, according to the government.

The Philippine government is leaning toward the conversion of the mothballed 630-megawatt Bataan nuclear power plant (BNPP) into a coal-fired facility as this has become a feasible option, according to Energy Secretary Jose Rene D. Almendras.

Almendras said this impression was based on the initial findings being conducted by the Department of Science and Technology (DoST), the agency tasked to look for the best technology that could be used to convert the BNPP to run on another fuel type.

“I’m still waiting for the results of the study but I think the government really wants to run the facility. The study is leaning toward more [on using] coal than natural gas because it’s difficult to convert the plant to run on natural gas. The question is, is it going to be more expensive to convert it or to build a new plant,” Almendras said.

“So we will wait [for the full results of the] new studies, the more recent studies. DoST will do the study and we’ll see if technology is capable. Then we will ask companies if they will be interested to bid for the possible conversion project,” Almendras said.

The energy chief stressed the need for new coal-fired facilities in Luzon, given the expected increases in the demand for electricity over the next few years. Having baseload plants will not only ensure supply, but will also help stabilize electricity prices as Luzon will no longer have to end up using the expensive electricity generated by the peaking plants.

However, the state-run National Power Corp. (Napocor), which oversees the maintenance of the BNPP, has urged the Aquino administration to commission a new study that would determine the viability of retrofitting the BNPP, if the present leadership really intended to explore that option.

Napocor president Froilan A. Tampinco said a fresh study would disprove earlier studies claiming that the conversion of the country’s first nuclear facility into gas- or coal-fired facility was technically feasible but not economically viable.

“Let’s invite a new study that will determine if present technologies are now better than what we had before and could thus translate [the BNPP conversion] into a feasible project. I am not discounting that, but if I go by the previous studies, that is really not feasible,” Tampinco said.

Tampinco said the previous studies stressed that the conversion of BNPP would be much more expensive than building a new facility because the parts and equipment of the mothballed facility were mostly outdated and its turbine generators have low output efficiencies compared to the newer models. As such, although the plant has been converted to run using another fuel, it could still yield low output efficiencies since the same generators would be used, an Inquirer source said.

The BNPP was built during the Marcos era by Westinghouse Electric at a cost of $2.2 billion. It was mothballed in 1986 due to safety concerns, even before it could begin operations. The structure is now dilapidated and outdated.

Over the past years, however, a number of foreign companies have expressed interest to rehabilitate the BNPP. Previous estimates put the cost of the rehabilitation at $1 billion.

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: BNPP conversion , Energy , nuclear power plant , Philippines

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
  • http://inquirer.net unokritiko

    I smell something dudes, a perfume !!! aha!! i know already dudes
    you are both the of same same genderation!!! you make my power of ESP stronger!!  in this case and i thank you for that!!! also for knowing “a very wrong mistake of error” at least you are learning from me dudes!! but you have to correct your sentencizing of “right course of action is a matter of choice not a facts” dudes!!
    Sorry to ends this up dudes, leave you a message that never used the word argumentation as both ends up a losereation.
    thank you for your correspondinatiation dudes!!!
    have a very good day, dudes Ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! mga tubog sa ginto!!!

    • Anonymous

      Lol you’re gonna play that gender card again? really?

      Please, don’t get people fooled that you actually won an argument. Mapapahiya ka lang, Case in point, the PAL Article. Oh by the way, a liar lawyer? really? the PAL Article is still there for people to see. I didn’t pretend, nor proclaimed, nor used any legal jargons and laws in there to make you tell me i’m a frustrated lawyer. Not unlike you who, for the record, pretended to be working in aviation as a pilot in an effort to put little credibility to yourself.  It’s all in there and people can read. You really want to do this? The last time you tried to argue with me you ended up calling someone who actually have neurons to use your account and argue with me. you can’t deny that since the last post in there has functional grammar and logic – something you lack big time.

      globalnation.inquirer.net/10599/pal-plane-with-busted-tire-lands-safely-in-los-angeles

      Don’t get ahead of yourself. I didn’t “come back” to “scrutinize” YOUR comments. Do you even know what scrutinize is? Don’t use big words to try to make yourself look smart. It’s not working and it’s embarrassing. To scrutinize is to examine in detail with careful or critical attention. My comment was for another person, not you. So what part of my comment led you to believe i came here to “scrutinize” your post?

      I came here to read the article and stumbled upon the comments. It’s as simple as that.

      • http://inquirer.net unokritiko

        Very well said indeed!! Mirror on the whole who’s the greatest of them all!!! of ccourse still unokritiko as they are coming back to me. Thank you sis!

      • Anonymous

        Did you finally search the word “Scrutinize” in the dictionary? You should so i or someone else wouldn’t have to correct you again. LOL

        One more, there no such word as Sentincizing. Seriously you call yourself a critic? Critics are reputable and credible people who have exceptional command of certain languages they use to effectively make their point. Enough said.



Copyright 2011 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • Researcher apologizes for study of gay therapy
  • Gay party set to make new bid for Congress
  • Ice chunks fall for first time in Cebu; whirlwind hits Pinamungahan village
  • Hailstorm in hot tropics?
  • Annabelle signs up: I’m ready to fight
  • Sports

  • Tams, Stags hurdle rivals
  • 2012 World Slashers Cup finals begin
  • Gandionco tops PH Am Junior tilt by 9
  • Orillaneda rules; PH aces gain finals
  • Luig, Zulberti snare 2nd kart series wins
  • Lifestyle

  • German baritone opera singer Fischer-Dieskau dead
  • Who’s Leviticus? Pacquiao says sorry to gays
  • Appeals court affirms libel conviction filed by Ricky Reyes vs publisher
  • ‘Black’ is back
  • Liam Cunningham delves into Davos
  • Entertainment

  • Hagar: Not surprised at Van Halen tour woes
  • Lady Gaga likes to be controversial, says show promoter
  • Jessica almost there; finale May 23
  • Religious groups press drive to ban Lady Gaga
  • Carrie Underwood ventures into uncharted territory
  • Business

  • Another bank placed under receivership
  • In April, BOP swung to a deficit of $79M
  • DTI reports hike in business registrations
  • Atlas Q1 profit down on low copper prices
  • P11-B FLI bond issue OKd
  • Technology

  • App-Pinoy: Check out these fun and handy homegrown apps for your device
  • Reports: HP poised to eliminate up to 30,000 jobs
  • PH still on US ‘watch list’ for counterfeit goods
  • As Facebook grows, millions say, ‘no, thanks’
  • Joey De Venecia sues NTC, telcos
  • Opinion

  • Déjà vu
  • After Tuesday
  • ‘Kung walang mahirap, walang corrupt’
  • Surveys and UP education
  • Rejecting fear
  • Global Nation

  • Honesty pays (P50,000) for airport cleaner
  • Discarded draft of Corona’s opening statement found?
  • It’s official: Plane tickets will include terminal fees
  • OFWs mostly young but getting ‘older,’ says NSCB
  • Philippines to receive 10 new patrol ships from Japan
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2011 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved
    news