Implications of a territorial dispute

Makati-taguig tug-of-war from experts’ POV

A+
A
A-

What are the implications in the tug-of-war between Makati, Taguig (and recently, Pateros) in their legal claim of the revenue-rich Bonifacio Global City-Fort Bonifacio area?

Real estate experts recently enumerated to Inquirer Property the five implications created by the continuing land dispute. The negatives are: growth curtailed, reduced confidence of tenants, confusion, and various interpretations of the decision.

However, there is also a positive implication whether the commercial properties are determined to be located in either Makati or Taguig. The cost of operations is lower if the business address is in Taguig, while real property taxes for commercial properties would be lower if they were in Makati’s jurisdiction.

Enrique M. Soriano III, Ateneo program director for real estate and senior adviser for Wong+Bernstein Business Advisory, said that major functions of government are to regulate, collect taxes, issue licenses and permit and deliver basic city services.

“When these functions are compromised because of territorial or boundary disputes, growth is also curtailed, and confidence of locators and businesses in BGC (numbering almost 100 operating vertical buildings and several retail and commercial developments) will wane.”

Reduced tenant confidence

Soriano said, “With an escalating tug-of-war, and it is likely this (case) will persist without any clear certainty for closure, and aggravated by the mixed and confusing pronouncements from the three mayors, we can expect BGC residents, tenants, locators and even future developers and investors to naturally waver, with their growth forecasts hanging.”

He added, “As we say in business, time is money, and if BGC (even if it’s our country’s showcase and newest CBD) will continue to be mired in a legal tug-of-war, businessmen will vote with their feet and run to the next competing CBD.”

In this scenario of conflicting claims, various interpretations of the decision would arise and affect the decisions of future locators in BGC.

Claro dG. Cordero Jr., Jones Lang LaSalle’s head for Research, Consulting and Valuation, said: “In light of the issue involving BGC, there is no foreseen direct implications on BGC residents and locators immediately, as the final takeover plans and details have yet to be laid out. Also, there are available legal remedies for both Taguig City and Makati City, which will aid in maintaining an orderly situation in BGC.

Confusion

“Over time, the only setback is the confusion and various interpretations of the decision which may affect the decision of future locators in BGC. Hence, the fastest that this case is resolved with finality, the most beneficial it would be for BGC locators and residents.

“Notwithstanding, we believe that both Taguig City and Makati City will arrive at an amicable resolution that will not tend to disrupt the business environment in Bonifacio Global City,” Cordero said.

Julius Guevara, Colliers International’s associate director for advisory services and head of consultancy and research, said the most-felt effect of the Makati-Taguig issue on Fort Bonifacio involves the cost of operating a business in the area.

“Locating a business in BGC or McKinley Hill presented cost savings for businesses since they could be located close to Makati while paying lower local taxes to Taguig,” Guevara  said.

He explained that “business taxes for mayor’s permit renewal in Taguig are about a third of Makati business taxes, so this presents huge cost savings.”

“This will definitely affect businesses located in Fort Bonifacio for the tax advantage. On the other hand, businesses that are Peza (Philippine Economic Zone Authority)-accredited (such as BPOs) are exempt from local taxes, so this will not affect them significantly.”

“In terms of real property taxes for commercial properties, Makati’s tax is actually lower than Taguig’s (2 percent versus 3 percent of assessed value, including the special education fund tax),” Guevara said.

He added that “for residential properties, the tax is the same between Makati and Taguig.”

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • hustlergalore

    akshully, ang pinakamaganda diyan magkakaroon na ng letter B sa mga lampposts at sidewalks ng BGC, which will be known from then on as binay gatasan city!

  • hustlergalore

    makataguig… gusto niyo?

    dalawang political dynasty na ang mag-aaway. squatter to squatter!

    hahahahaha

  • Pablo Juan

    hay sayang ang taguig.. sana hindi rin magiging sayang ang pilipinas sa 2016.

  • LV_cipher

    Quite true, however, the concerns of the businesses and condo owners with the transfer of BGC from Taguig to Makati is quite a superficial issue compared to the long term prospects of the constituents of Taguig considering the significant loss of revenues for the city. Basically, whatever increment in taxes these locators within BGC will “suffer”, they can afford to pay for it. They are too rich to flinch over such a minor inconvenience. Whereas for the majority of residents of Taguig City (i.e., those from outside of BGC) — without the tax collection from BGC — this means lower quality of services from the local government in terms of infrastructure expenditure and social services (i.e., medical, education, community outreach, etc.). It would have been less painful for the people of Taguig if the Court of Appeals has acted faster on this case. The longer the case in limbo, the greater the uncertainty for all concerned parties. Here’s hoping that SC will resolve this issue of jurisdiction expediently and judiciously.

  • WeAry_Bat

    Makati coming in to the picture has such been a big damper. A number of companies and departments from every point of the compass in Metro Manila should have been converging in BGC.

    It would have made a dynamic twin to Makati, making the former more of the commercial-residential, making its overheated business sector cool down for a few years, a rationalized gathering before the next level up. Except that intermediary stage would mean lesser income, thus the struggle.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

editors' picks

advertisement

popular

advertisement

videos