Comelec’s money ban bad for small, medium enterprises, say business leaders

A+
A
A-

MANILA, Philippines—Business leaders concerned about operations of small and medium enterprises criticized the Commission on Election’s (Comelec) “money ban.”

 

The money ban prohibits the withdrawal of more than P100,000 from banks and other financial institutions from May 8 to May 13. The Comelec has also prohibited the “possession, transportation and/or carrying” of more than P500,000 in cash.

 

“That is a poorly made resolution. It will not really address concerns on vote buying but will create difficulties for businesses, especially medium and small establishments, and workers who depend on them,” Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI) vice-chairperson Donald Dee said in an interview.

 

Dee noted that businesses too small to automate wages, for example, would still give out cash. “What will happen to workers who are supposed to get their wages on Saturday? Will small businesses have to make several small withdrawals instead of P100,000 or more? That’s too much hassle for them,” Dee said.

 

Management Association of the Philippines president Melito Salazar said in a text message that the resolution seemed “well intentioned” but he saw many implications especially for businessmen paying suppliers, usually in cash.

 

“(The amount) P100,000 is not that big these days so the impact really is on SMEs. If I were a businessman I may just sacrifice being liable and explain later that I used the money for my business. In other words, it is a law that people will not take seriously,” he said.

 

Besides, Salazar said, money to be used to buy votes might have already been withdrawn.

 

Chamber of Thrift Banks executive director Suzanne Felix, meanwhile, said in a statement that thrift banks should abide by all laws, rules and regulations. “While we recognize and support the Comelec’s efforts to ensure clean and honest elections, we are concerned that limitations or hindrances on withdrawals, check encashments, and transportation of cash may disrupt banking operations as well as normal business and commercial transactions in the country,” Felix said.

 

The Bankers Association of the Philippines said Wednesday its members will not comply with the Comelec’s “money ban,” which the group said would be disruptive to business and commercial transactions within the economy.

 

In a text message to the Philippine Daily Inquirer Wednesday morning, BAP president Lorenzo Tan said banks would take orders only from appropriate regulators, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

The BSP released a statement late Tuesday indicating it would not order banks to implement the money ban, which has prohibited the withdrawal of more than P100,000 from banks and other financial institutions from May 8 to May 13. The Comelec has also prohibited the “possession, transportation and/or carrying” of more than P500,000 in cash.

 

The Comelec said the money ban was meant to curb vote buying, believed to be rampant a few days before an election day. But while the BSP called the intention of the Comelec noble, it said the money ban would not be the appropriate measure to achieve the goal of clean and honest elections.

 

The central bank gave two reasons for its opposition:

 

  • First, the BSP said, the money ban could disrupt normal business and commercial transactions in the Philippines. It said it believed Comelec should pursue other means to help ensure  clean and honest elections because sacrificing normalcy of economic activities in the country would be costly.

Second, imposing the provisions of the money ban would violate the laws on the secrecy of peso- and foreign currency-denominated bank deposits, particularly Republic Act 1405 and 6426, respectively. For authorities to be able to investigate suspected violations of the money ban, bank accounts of concerned individuals would have to be looked into, it said.

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • disqusted0fu

    No matter what angle you look at, there’s nothing good about this money ban that the Comelec came up with, even on the angle of its supposed purpose. This ban is not just harmful for enterprises, it is for certain ineffective. In short, it’s a plain old dumb decision on Comelec’s part to even come up with something like this.

  • MNLFoodcritic

    It’s one of those decisions that were not carefully thought out, not discussed with various affected parties and in most likelihood just decided quickly over a 20-minute breakfast: Sixto “Anong gagawin natin laban sa vote buying?”, Comelec board member “Ipagbawal ang pagwithdraw ng 100k!” Sixto: “Good idea, let’s implement ASAP!” I don’t think they even had a thorough discussion with BSP, DTI and even NBI or PNP, probably just a small discussion amongst themselves and BOOM, made a decision.

    • MNLFoodcritic

      …oh and I forgot…made fools of themselves in the process…

  • Manuel_II

    Somone should. file charges against Sixto for his stupid resolution.

    • http://twitter.com/Negastarr NegaStarr

      Specifically what?

      • Manuel_II

        For trying to stop me and millions other Filipinos from withdrawing and transporting OUR OWN money that was only entrusted for safe keeping in the banks. Need i say more.

      • http://twitter.com/Negastarr NegaStarr

        Yeah, I understand. But what particular charge (criminal, civil, administrative) will you file against Brillantes?

      • Manuel_II

        your trying to get smart with me, well even our own Senator Ralph Recto is not sure what kind of law was violated but let me assure you i trust someone will. LOL

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94