‘Interventionist’ measures eyed to decongest Manila ports


The Department of Transportation and Communications may resort to more “interventionist” measures to decongest Manila’s ports, such as the South Harbor (in photo) in favor of underutilized facilities in Subic and Batangas. AFP

MANILA, Philippines—The Department of Transportation and Communications may resort to more “interventionist” measures to decongest Manila’s ports in favor of underutilized facilities in Subic and Batangas, including recommending certain government guarantees for shipping companies.

The move represents a significant shift in policy as earlier efforts to let market forces naturally divert shipping traffic away from Manila have failed, Transportation Secretary Joseph Emilio Abaya said last week.

“We are trying to restrain government intervention but we might just have to come into this in a calculated manner,” Abaya said.

The DOTC previously tapped the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) to come up with several proposals to solve the issue.

Among the proposals are implementing certain caps on Manila’s harbors as well as a proposal for a “take or pay” guarantee to encourage shipping companies to use Batangas and Subic.

Abaya said the agency was reviewing all options, including the take or pay proposal, despite the negative stigma associated with the scheme given the bad experiences in the past involving the power sector during the Ramos administration.

Some Manila-based ports operators also raised concerns that diverting traffic away from the capital could raise shipping costs.

“I know people are allergic with that phrase (take or pay). We’ve had some horrible experiences with it. But done well and really carefully studied this would (help solve) the problem,” Abaya said.

“We are calibrating our way and talking with all stakeholders so that they are aware if this is going to hit them so they can prepare,” Abaya said.

The JICA proposals have yet to be approved by Abaya, according to the DOTC spokesman. The next step in the process is for these to be reviewed by the so-called economic development cluster, which includes the Department of Finance and the National Economic and Development Authority.

Abaya said the DOTC was simultaneously studying measures to bring down the cost of shipping within the country. He, however, did not elaborate.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Ben

    The government has the power to stimulate growth and distribute development in all areas where they are needed..that is the main power of the government. The DOTC has the power to give PPP a go signal to erect a world class terminal in Subic and even in Clark`s new airport and connect them with a high speed double track railway system for express and or local train stops as well as hauling goods through freight trains for the north and south distributions. Again where is the PPP needed for those crucial development to further raise the country`s GNP/GDP economic growth rate? Remember we are aiming for a minimum of 8% GDP/GNP to have a real effect on poverty alleviation…why are they taking too long to implement it, that`s a concern of all citizens of this country and demand those politicians campaigning to be elected to do more for the common good, not only for their own benefit.

  • tgtercero

    It is about time. Huli man daw at magaling, na-ihahabol din! So much wasted time. This “intervention” ought to have been done at least twenty years ago. Decongesting MetroManila will create new wealth and economic opportunities elsewhere. The social cost to all of MetroManila due to congestion will be eased. MetroManila will be the principal beneficiary, as well as all the venues of increased economic activity due to decongestion.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos