IMF urges countries to cut energy subsidies

A+
A
A-

WASHINGTON – The International Monetary Fund urged countries to reduce subsidies on energy, saying they worsen government’s fiscal positions and eventually create more advantages for the wealthy instead of the poor.

In a broad-reaching report, the IMF said subsidies of oil, petrol and electricity are aimed at helping consumers, but end up costing them as governments struggle to shoulder the cost burden.

Moreover, the study said, subsidies encourage energy waste, discourage investment in energy-efficient industries, and exacerbate pollution and global warming.

Worldwide the direct subsidies on energy — when consumers pay less than the basic supply costs — amounted to $480 billion worldwide in 2011, according to the IMF.

If post-tax subsidies are counted — when the prices do not cover such things like the negative impact on the environment — the government support worldwide measured $1.9 trillion.

Most of the subsidies are in oil exporters, where they contribute to speeded-up depletion of a natural resource.

But energy importers suffer especially as global oil and gas prices have risen over the past three years.

Many have not responded by adjusting domestic energy prices to match the increases — and so expanding the fiscal burden of subsidies, according to the report.

“In recent years, we have been hearing about countries that are finding that the fiscal weight of energy subsidies is growing too large to bear,” said IMF first deputy managing director David Lipton, in an address introducing the report in Washington.

“In some countries budget deficits are becoming unmanageable and threatening the stability of the economy.”

He said that countries that have offered subsidies to help struggling populations “now find they suffer both fiscal paralysis and energy shortages.”

Lipton said 20 countries in the world maintain subsidies that top five percent of their GDP.

Such subsidies “remain a stumbling block to higher growth by squeezing out much needed health, education and infrastructure spending,” he said.

But the report points out that, if post-tax subsidies are counted, the largest offenders are the United States, China and Russia — together their subsidies reach nearly $900 billion worth.

Cutting subsidies could have a significant impact in the fight against global warming, Lipton said.

“About 15-30 percent of a key global emissions reduction goal can be achieved just by stopping to encourage excessive energy use via pre-tax subsidies,” he said.

“And the gains from tackling post-tax subsidies would be even larger, as this would reduce CO2 emissions by 4.5 billion tons, a 13 percent reduction.”

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bobby.espedilla Bobby Espedilla

    Subsidized the construction of power plant not the billing of consumer.

    • DISQUS_PeaceMan

      If this is possible, this would help fast track that constructions of powerplants in Mindanao.

  • http://www.facebook.com/noelsantos37 pathfinder093

    mahihirapan na ko magbayad ng koryente pag inalis pa ng gobyerno ang subsidy..baka mag-illegal connection na lang ako..

    • DISQUS_PeaceMan

      Did you get a subsidy on your electric bill? wow!

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

editors' picks

advertisement

popular

advertisement

videos