Corporate Securities Info

Gov’t retirement benefits


Finally, after 18 months, the Civil Service Commission has come up with the implementing rules and regulations of Republic Act 10154 which requires the early release of the retirement benefits of public officials and employees.

The law applies to the retirement pay, pensions, gratuities and other benefits of retiring employees in all government offices, including government-owned and -controlled corporations, except personnel of the Armed Forces of the Philippines.

The implementing rules state that, under pain of administrative sanctions, these benefits should be paid by the government offices concerned within 30 days from the actual retirement date of the employee.

This obligation rests on the assumption that the employee has filed his intention to retire from the service (whether compulsory or optional) not later than 120 days prior to his retirement date.

After making known his plan, the employee should submit the documents that the office may require for that purpose at least 100 days before quitting the service.

Upon receipt of these documents, the office must immediately take the proper steps to process the application, compute the retirement benefits due and verify the authenticity and accuracy of those papers.

Thus, barring any hitches, come retirement date, the employee can look forward to receiving his money within a month’s time.

Pending cases

The rules provide that payment of the retirement benefits may be withheld only under the following conditions:

The employee has a pending administrative case whose outcome may give rise to his obligation to pay a certain sum of money to the government

A law applicable to the employee specifically authorizes the withholding of the retirement benefits.

Lest it be misunderstood or misused by people with unscrupulous intentions, not every case or complaint filed against a government employee constitutes an administrative case that would justify withholding the release of his benefits.

It is common knowledge that some people who fail to win bids in government projects or were stymied from getting special favors from government officers try to get back at their perceived enemies by filing all kinds of administrative cases, no matter how flimsy, against them.

The rules clearly state that an administrative case shall be construed as such only “when the disciplining authority has issued a formal charge or a notice of charges” to the employee concerned.

In other words, the case or complaint has been evaluated by the disciplining authority as sufficient to warrant a formal investigation on its merits. It may be likened to a complaint filed by a prosecutor in court after preliminary investigation.


The pendency of an administrative case, however, will not bar the release of “terminal/accrued leave benefits” that the retiree may be entitled to at the time of his retirement.

This is only fair because his right over these benefits has already been vested by virtue of the services he earlier rendered for which the leaves were given to him.

In “Carmelita Lledo vs Atty. Cesar V. Lledo, Branch Clerk of Court, RTC Branch 94, Quezon City,” Administrative Case No. P-95-1167, dated Feb. 9, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled that “despite being dismissed from the service, government employees are entitled to the monetary equivalent of their leave credits since these were earned prior to their dismissal.”

To minimize the adverse effects of the withholding of benefits, the rules impose on the employee’s office the obligation to ensure that the case is terminated or resolved within three months from the date of his retirement.

If that period lapses and the case remains unresolved without justifiable reasons or through no fault of the retiree, the retirement benefits should be immediately released without prejudice to the outcome of the case.

Meaning, in the event he is ordered to pay the government a certain sum of money, he has to draw from his resources (or whatever may be left from his retirement benefits) to satisfy the monetary judgment. If he fails to do so, the government may file a collection suit against him.

But knowing the slow pace of justice in our country, by the time the court decides that case, the retiree may be either six feet under the ground or nowhere to be found.


Since the retirement benefits of government employees are drawn from public funds, it is incumbent on government offices to see to it that, way ahead of the retirement of their employees, sufficient provisions are made in the budget they submit to the Department of Budget and Management for the payment of the said benefits.

This task is not rocket science. If personnel records are properly kept, monitored and updated, there is no reason for delay or failure to get budgetary allocation and approval to ensure payment of retirement benefits to employees at the time of their retirement (which is most ideal), or at the latest within 30 days from the date they make their final goodbye to the office.

The officials and employees of government offices who fail or refuse without justifiable reasons to receive complete applications for retirement, or act on such applications within the prescribed periods, or release the retirement benefits due to a retiree can look forward to, after due notice and hearing, suspension from the service for up to one year or, worse, dismissal.

For comments, please send your email to

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • parefrank

    The government should stop to shower benefits, off days and cash gifts over its employees and better start to think about benefits for the much harder and uncomfortable working common people. Easy promises and manipulated improvement reports can not feed the hungry stomachs while prices go up and up and up. The gigantic billion profits of big business are also not very helpful to the ouur, since they pay for the profits.

  • raul n

    civil service should throw this to GSIS who can not give retirement benefits upon retirement right away.

  • mxsclxmxn

    In the P100 BILL series 2012 Serial # ZK188477 has a logo of the Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons. Freemasonry has its goal of destroying Christendom and replacing it with man-centered government and Satanic religion filled with errors. 
    How can this logo of a satanic group be allowed to print in the monetary instrument of the country with the constitution believing in a God asking for HIS Divine Providence?

  • vaporub123

    kung masusunod sana ang panukala na ito ay napakagandang balita lalo na sa mga public school teachers.mawawala ang mga fixers sa loob.sana lang sundin ito ng mga ahensya ng gobyerno.marami nga dyan papaty ng mga retirees ni isang kusing wala pang nakukuha pati mga benefactors.pagkatapos pakinabangan ng gobyerno ang mga taong ito dapat lang agarang ang pagtulong bilang pasalamat sa sebisyong ginawa.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos