Philex Mining faces additional P1.6M fine, possible criminal rap for cutting trees


BAGUIO CITY, Philippines—Government foresters said gold producer Philex Mining Corp. is criminally liable for building a road through a Benguet watershed without securing proper clearances like an environmental compliance certificate (ECC).

Edgardo Flor, city environment and natural resources officer (CENRO), on Wednesday said Philex violated the National Integrated Protected Areas System Act of 1992 (the Nipas Act or Republic Act 7586), the Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree 705) and President Aquino’s Executive Order 23, which imposed a national log ban.

A forest management team, on its second inspection of the Lower Agno Forest Watershed Reserve last week, said Philex destroyed 4.39 kilometers of woodland, including areas contracted for the government’s national greening program, to build a 6-meter-wide road to its new waste facility at Sitio (settlement) Banao in Barangay (village) Ampucao in Itogon, Benguet.

The new tailings pond replaces Philex’s Padcal mine tailings pond Number 3, which spilled waste in 2012, for which the company paid more than P1 billion in fines on Monday.

Flor ordered Philex to stop the road project on Feb. 11, citing the foresters’ Jan. 28 report that said that “in the course of bulldozing the access road, numerous Benguet pine and gmelina trees were uprooted [and] some trees were left barely hanging [by their] secondary roots.”

The forest violations may cost Philex P1 million in fines, as well as criminal charges for destroying a forest, according to a Feb. 19 report filed by seven foresters.

The report said the team failed to conduct an inventory of all trees that appeared to have been bulldozed in clearing operations.

It said the total value of the damaged trees and saplings reached P165,386.70. The value may reach P1.6 million when it is multiplied by 10 to cover moral and exemplary damages, as prescribed by a Department of Environment and Natural Resources order.

Lawyer Eduardo Aratas, Philex legal officer for its Padcal mine operations, said the company did nothing wrong when it proceeded to build the road.

He also said that the DENR was supposed to present its findings to Philex in a technical meeting.

In a Feb. 11 letter to the DENR, Libby Ricafort, Philex vice president for operations, said the area where they built a road has been hosting Philex’s reforestation projects. The road traverses a lot being leased by the company, according to Ricafort.

The foresters said Philex was still required to secure tree-cutting permits if the road stood on private property. “The harvesting and utilization of trees” are still subject to EO 23, even if these trees stand on Philex’s reforestation area, according to the foresters.

They said the road passed through the Lower Agno Reserve, an environmentally critical area.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • upupperclassman

    All of a sudden, all sorts of government officials are pointing accusing fingers at Philex Mining. This  “palabas” is getting too much. Philex should not have agreed to pay the P1 Billion fine and instead take DENR to court. Remember Lucio Tan took the BIR to court for P1 Billion also and won the case.

  • joboni96

    singilin na yang si pangilinan
    at amo niyang intsik switik

    mining only

  • Lone Ranger

    In its haste to re-operate the Padcal mine for profit, Philex is demonstrating its shameless disregard of laws. This irresponsible miner has shown its true face. It’s apparent that profit at all costs is its mission and vision, in total disregard of the environment.

  • Echuserang_Froglet

    grave ha pang huhuthot blackmail na ang ginagawa ng govyernong ito. pppppppwwwwwwweeehhhhh kadiri eeeeeeeeeewwwwwwww

  • Marco Fernando

    It’s weird, but EO 23 states the following:

    1.1 Forest Land – it includes public forest, permanent forest or forest reserves, and forest reservations.1.2 Natural and Residual Forests- are forests composed of indigenous trees, not planted by man.1.3 Plantation Forest – is a forest where the trees were planted pursuant to a management agreement with the DENR.I don’t see any private land here, unless of course there are indigenous trees on the reforestation area of Philex, but since this is a reforestation area the it’s safe to assume there is none. Lastly, I don’t think this reforestation project is part of a Management Agreement with DENR since Philex is not into logging business. There’s something wrong in the logic of the DENR understanding of EO 23.

  • mike Michael

    siguradong abot tenga ngiti ni Manay Gina.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos