Quantcast
Latest Stories

US accuses S&P of fraud in mortgage bond ratings

By

Standard & Poor’s has been accused Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013, by the US Justice Department, which alleged that the rating agency knowingly exaggerated the ratings on financial securities, misrepresenting their true credit risk. AP PHOTO/HENNY RAY ABRAMS

NEW YORK—US Justice Department officials Tuesday accused Standard & Poor’s of fraud for inflating the ratings of mortgage bonds before the 2008 crisis, costing federally insured institutions at least $5 billion in losses.

Announcing a suit against S&P and its parent, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Attorney General Eric Holder said the rating agency knowingly exaggerated the ratings on financial securities, misrepresenting their true credit risk.

“Put simply, this alleged conduct is egregious—and it goes to the very heart of the recent financial crisis,” said Holder, flanked by justice officials from several states joining the suit.

“Today’s action is an important step forward in our ongoing efforts to investigate and punish the conduct that is believed to have contributed to the worst economic crisis in recent history,” Holder said.

The government accused the powerful credit rater of knowingly inflating its ratings on collateralized debt obligations in 2007 in order to win revenue from issuers.

S&P “knowingly and with the intent to defraud, devised, participated in and executed a scheme to defraud investors,” the civil suit, filed in California, said.

The suit targets S&P’s ratings in 2007 of CDOs, mortgages packaged into securities, that later plunged in value due to the US housing collapse, triggering the global crisis.

The complaint does not specify a financial penalty, but accuses S&P of wire fraud, mail fraud and financial institution fraud. The law provides a $1.1 million penalty for each violation, according to the complaint.

S&P promised a vigorous defense, saying the looming lawsuit would be “entirely without factual or legal merit.”

The Justice Department complaint lays out the case by noting that S&P “knew” its credit ratings were “material and relied upon by financial institutions” to assess risk.

S&P faced an apparent conflict of interest because it was dependent on issuers, who paid as much as $750,000 for issuance of some investment vehicles, according to the complaint.

S&P repeatedly pronounced itself “objective and independent” in company literature and in public statements.

Yet, the government argues that S&P repeatedly compromised its independence in executing ratings.

It lays out internal communications in which S&P considered the need to update its analytic models to keep up with the securities in the changing market, only to continue with the weaker models that permitted higher ratings to go through.

S&P’s modus operandi was to “limit, adjust and delay those updates” to favor issuers and “maintain and grow S&P’s market share and profits,” the complaint alleges.

S&P argued Monday that in 2007 and prior to that time, it had downgraded a number of residential mortgage-backed securities included in the CDOs ahead of other ratings agencies.

“With 20/20 hindsight, these strong actions proved insufficient—but they demonstrate that the DoJ would be wrong in contending that S&P ratings were motivated by commercial considerations and not issued in good faith,” it said.

S&P also said it was far from alone in its failure to predict the scale of the housing collapse.

That crash wiped hundreds of billions of dollars in value from mortgage securities, leading to the government having to step in and rescue major banks that had invested in them.

Up until last week, the Justice Department and S&P had held settlement talks. But the discussions ceased after the Justice Department said it would seek at least $1 billion to settle the case, according to the New York Times, which cited people who were briefed on the government’s plans.

S&P is a unit of McGraw-Hill, whose shares was 5.3 percent lower in morning trade after losing nearly 14 percent Monday.


Follow Us


Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: company , Finance , housing , litigation , Ratings , S&P , US

  • Saint Luci

    The article wrote – US Justice department is willing to settle at $1B.

    Talk about high level (legally allowed) extortion. Only in the US ika nga nila.

  • Mario_Garcia

    So why not stop the S&P from rating any securities for six years.

  • http://twitter.com/0pinion8Ted 0pinion8Ted

    It’s all about greed where everything and anything is expendable.



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement

News

  • Drilon denies involvement in pork scam
  • Complex health care system for California’s elderly and poor explained
  • Malang the croc must regain strength before return to swamp, says mayor
  • Palace: Lacson’s version of Napoles testimony to be evaluated
  • Scientists eye iceberg bigger than Guam
  • Sports

  • Guiao summoned by PBA for name-calling incident
  • Promoters Dela Hoya, Arum in talks for Pacquiao-Alvarez—report
  • Benzema guides Madrid to 1-0 win over Bayern
  • Suns’ Goran Dragic win NBA’s Most Improved Player award
  • Heat go up 2-0, hold off Bobcats 101-97
  • Lifestyle

  • Gongs and southern dances star in a workshop at San Francisco Bayanihan Center
  • This woman ate what?
  • Photos explore dynamics of youths’ sexual identity
  • 12th Philippine Food Expo set at the World Trade Center
  • No tourist draw, Malang the croc will remain wild
  • Entertainment

  • Smithsonian wants photos, videos for ‘Day in the Life of Asian Pacific Americans’
  • What Garcia Marquez left behind
  • Has Ai Ai fallen deeply with ‘sireno?’
  • Sony developing live-action Barbie comedy
  • California court won’t review Jackson doctor case
  • Business

  • Metro Pacific acquires stake in Victorias
  • How ‘one percent’ economic elite was uncovered
  • Facebook profits triple as mobile soars
  • Insular Honors Sales Performers at Testimonial Rites
  • Apple increases stock buyback, will split stock
  • Technology

  • Enrile in Masters of the Universe, Lord of the Rings?
  • Top Traits of Digital Marketers
  • No truth to viral no-visa ‘chronicles’
  • ‘Unlimited’ Internet promos not really limitless; lawmakers call for probe
  • Viber releases new design for iPhone, comes to Blackberry 10 for the first time
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, April 24, 2014
  • Talking to Janet
  • Respite
  • Bucket list
  • JPII in 1981: walking a tightrope
  • Global Nation

  • Obama to visit Filipino soldiers in Fort Bonifacio
  • Fil-Am youth conferences unite under one theme
  • Embassy advisory: Filipinos still need visas to enter US
  • No travel restriction to Mideast, DFA clarifies
  • PH-HK relations repaired, but families of victims still being courted
  • Marketplace