Quantcast
Latest Stories

Airline owners remain banned from Mactan-Cebu airport bidding

By

The Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) is standing firm on its decision to bar companies with airline interests from bidding for the multibillion-peso contract to develop the country’s second-largest commercial airport.

In a briefing on Tuesday, Transportation Secretary Joseph Emilio Abaya said the rule disqualifying airline groups from the Mactan-Cebu International Airport project aimed to eliminate all possible conflicts of interest.

The exclusion of companies with investments in airlines significantly narrowed the field of bidders capable—financially and technically—of taking on the P16-billion project.

“It’s the first time we are doing this and it’s a learning process. We want to dwell on the conservative side to eliminate all forms of conflict of interest,” Abaya told reporters.

The rule automatically disqualifies San Miguel Corp., which has a stake and manages flag carrier Philippine Airlines (PAL), and JG Summit Holdings, owner of budget carrier Cebu Pacific, from the project.

Apart from controlling PAL, San Miguel, through unit TransAire Development Holdings Corp., operates the Godofredo P. Ramos airport in Caticlan, the country’s gateway to tourist hotspot Boracay Island. Both conglomerates had earlier expressed interest in the Mactan-Cebu Airport project.

The remaining groups that have signified their intention to bid for the project are the partnership between Ayala Corp. and the Cebu-based Aboitiz Equity Ventures and the Pangilinan-led Metro Pacific Investments Corp.

The existing Mactan Cebu International Airport is the country’s second-biggest air passenger facility. In 2011, the airport handled more than 4.74 million domestic passengers and 1.47 million international travelers. Passenger numbers grew at the facility at a compounded annual rate of 14.47 percent for domestic traffic and 11.02 percent for international traffic over the last five years.


Follow Us


Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://business.inquirer.net/?p=102935

Tags: airline owners , bidding , Business , Mactan-Cebu airport , Philippines

  • ozkid

    Common sense should prevail on these. The issue about conflict of interest is absolutely irrelevant or something on that regard because after completion of the project, it will then be turnover to the government agency concern who’s responsible for its operation.

    We also need to evaluate the decisions and the position of those who’s calling the shots in DOTC. I think they got it wrong this time.

  • asdafaa qwesda

    Someone please tell me what the conflict of interest is? Given that no other government in the world recognizes such a conflict of interest I’m very suspicious.

    It is in the airlines interest to make sure the airport operates as efficiently and effectively as possible. Will the bidder also operate the airport? As far as I know they won’t. And whoever renovates the airport cannot exclude or charge a higher price to competitors for using the facilities. So where is the conflict of interest?!

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_V6JTYBZXUSXIDCD67ACZK7NUKM Joseph

      Even if an airline wins the bidding, what prices can they raise in the airport when EVERYTHING in the airport is regulated by the government?

      This is from the terminal fees, to take-off/landing fees, the advertising fees, and even down to the rental fees airlines pay to occupy the check-in counters. Since these are all regulated by the gov’t and are all subjec to public bidding, how the hell can conflict of interest happen?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TQXRFWGXBTLLL6GNN6566P2VN4 lius

    as predicted before, this action was done to exclude the powerhouse companies that have the financial muscle against their preferred winner, people should see beyond this action by the DOTC because this is just to let them have their way. By the way, this action by DOTC is I think a usual action by government agency if they preferred another bidder, its just in this case, its a multi-billion contract that is being wrestled with

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZEI6SHG7MUONC75TPXZRCMQIII Dominic

      It would be a conflict of interest if the gov’t would allow airlines companies to build airport.
      Airlines companies should stick what they do best, make sure airplanes fly in and out on time and most importantly make sure it is 110% safe.

    • cleoan

      totally reasonable exclusion rule…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003516764413 Jean Claude

    this is correct. i hope Ayala-Aboitiz wins the project :D

  • Copernicus99

    The government should also bid out the construction and development of modern passenger terminals in major tourist destinations such as Bohol, Puerto Princesa, Coron, Naga, etc. in order to aid the growth of tourism in the country. Obviously, the government does not have the funds to undertake these projects in the short term. Such are better left to the private sector.

  • picker_blend

    finally! a government agency that notices “conflict of interest”! miracles do happen indeed.



Copyright © 2013, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • Estrada, old Cabinet discuss new job
  • Antipolo mayor files poll protest, accuses rival of fraud
  • Psst! It’s now PST, not ‘Filipino time’
  • Brillantes blames telcos anew for failure to transmit results
  • ‘Dynasties helped party lists win’
  • Sports

  • Lady Bulldogs’ poor reception key in V-League finals game one downfall, says coach
  • Lady Eagles seize Game 1 in 3
  • Azkals call off Kyrgyzstan friendly
  • Caluscusin top rhythmic gymnast with 3 golds
  • Big Chill rounds out D-League semis cast
  • Lifestyle

  • A learning tree on campus
  • #OOTD–the ‘outfit of the day’
  • Yellow chicken fast gaining popularity at Wee Nam Kee
  • Chicken mangosteen curry, papaya salad, soft-shell crabs–Thai cuisine reworked for the Filipino palate
  • ‘Turon’ with ‘panocha’
  • Entertainment

  • Graphic gay sex stirs controversy at Cannes
  • New show will have ‘Party Pilipinas’ team
  • Bella Flores Foundation planned
  • A heady dose of indie rock, fashion at Wanderland fest
  • Kapatid wishes Willie well
  • Business

  • Tokyo plunges more than 7% as Asian markets fall
  • Coke workers’ strike ends in amicable settlement
  • Lenovo says quarterly profit up 90 percent
  • Switzerland eyes law on frozen dictator funds
  • Survey shows China manufacturing contracting
  • Technology

  • Media watchdog criticizes UAE over tweeter’s jail term
  • Twitter tightens security after high-profile breaches
  • Risky behavior starts young on web—survey
  • Office bullying video sparks outcry in Singapore
  • Poll: Teens migrating to Twitter
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, May 24, 2013
  • Out of the doldrums
  • Fighting over champagne
  • The poor didn’t benefit
  • Post-op
  • Global Nation

  • Pope Francis may visit Philippines in 2016—CBCP
  • Asia tension could lead to conflict—DFA chief
  • DOT seeks new markets for Boracay after Taiwan tourists cancel bookings
  • CA stops PH-Japanese contract to develop Nampeidai property in Tokyo
  • Brown hounded for calling Manila ‘gates of hell’
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved
    skinner left
    skinner right